Kinetic Energy & Relativity: E=mc^2

  • Thread starter abccbaabc014
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Relativity
In summary, the wikipedia article on Kinetic Energy states that kinetic energy for single objects is frame-dependent, meaning it can vary depending on the observer's reference frame. For example, a bullet may have kinetic energy in one reference frame, but zero kinetic energy in another. This also applies to mass, with the concept of relativistic mass taking into account the kinetic energy of an object, while invariant mass is a property of the object itself and does not depend on the observer. Different observers may ascribe different values of relativistic mass to the same object at the same time.
  • #1
abccbaabc014
7
0
The wikipedia article on Kinetic Energy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy

"Kinetic energy for single objects is completely frame-dependent (relative). For example, a bullet racing by a non-moving observer has kinetic energy in the reference frame of this observer, but the same bullet has zero kinetic energy in the reference frame which moves with the bullet."

If two people in separate reference frames disagree on the kinetic energy of a bullet, do they also disagree on the mass? (I'm thinking of E=mc^2 here)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, yes, of course. If an object has rest mass m0 (the mass in a frame relative to which it has speed 0), then an observer moving at speed v relative to the object it has mass [itex]m_0/\sqrt{1- v^2/c^2}[/itex]- the faster it moves (relatively, of course) the greater the mass.
 
  • #3
DrGreg said:
The subject of "mass" in relativity crops up regularly in this forum, and it necessary to point out the word has (at least) two different meanings in relativity
  1. Relativistic mass includes within it the kinetic energy of the object, and so depends on the relative speed of the object to the observer. Different observers can ascribe different values of relativistic mass to the same object at the same time.
  2. Invariant mass, also known as rest mass, excludes kinetic energy, and it a property of the object itself and does not depend on the observer.
Not all authors agree which of these two definitions to use when you say "mass" without further explanation. The modern convention amongst most physicists is to use definition 2, but there are still some people who use definition 1. Neither definition is technically wrong, but one reason 1 is considered unnecessary is because relativistic mass is really just another name for "energy" (via E = mc2). For an object that is stationary relative to the observer, the two definitions give the same answer.
So the answer to your question is "yes" if you mean relativistic mass, but "no" if you mean invariant mass.
 

Related to Kinetic Energy & Relativity: E=mc^2

1. What is kinetic energy?

Kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses due to its motion. It is dependent on the mass and velocity of the object.

2. What is the relationship between kinetic energy and relativity?

In the theory of relativity, kinetic energy is a form of energy that contributes to the mass of an object. This means that as an object's velocity increases, its mass also increases, thus increasing its kinetic energy.

3. How is kinetic energy related to the famous equation E=mc^2?

E=mc^2 is the equation for the conversion of mass into energy, or vice versa. In this equation, "m" represents the mass of an object and "c" represents the speed of light. This means that an object with a large amount of kinetic energy will have a larger mass and therefore, a larger value for "m" in the equation.

4. Can kinetic energy be converted into other forms of energy?

Yes, kinetic energy can be converted into other forms of energy, such as potential energy, thermal energy, or electrical energy. This is known as the principle of energy conservation.

5. How does the concept of kinetic energy and relativity impact our understanding of the universe?

The theory of relativity and the relationship between mass, energy, and velocity has greatly impacted our understanding of the universe. It has allowed us to develop technologies such as nuclear energy, which harnesses the energy produced by the conversion of mass into energy. It has also helped us understand the behavior of objects traveling at high speeds, such as those in space. Overall, the concept of kinetic energy and relativity has greatly expanded our understanding of the universe and its workings.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
749
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
484
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
16
Views
406
Back
Top