Toxcicity of Plutonium and Bernard Cohen

  • Thread starter Azael
  • Start date
In summary, Professor Cohen is going to eat a lot of Plutonium oxide to increase his radiation exposure. Even though it's a small amount, it's still a risk to him and others.
  • #1
Azael
257
1
I recently read about Cohens challange to go on national tv against any nucler critic and eat as much Plutonium oxide in weight as the opponet eats caffeine.

Ld50 for caffeine is around 13 grams. But if my calculations are right far less than 13grams of plutonium would be lethal. According to Cohen himself and other references the dose in Sv for each Bq of Pu239 ingested is 1*10^-7 Sv/Bq. 13grams of Pu239 is 3*10^10Bq so ingesting it should give a dose of 3000Sv!(Assuming it takes around 48hours for it to pass through the digestive system)

So how could Cohen make that challange?:confused:
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Azael said:
I recently read about Cohens challange to go on national tv against any nucler critic and eat as much Plutonium oxide in weight as the opponet eats caffeine.

Ld50 for caffeine is around 13 grams. But if my calculations are right far less than 13grams of plutonium would be lethal. According to Cohen himself and other references the dose in Sv for each Bq of Pu239 ingested is 1*10^-7 Sv/Bq. 13grams of Pu239 is 3*10^10Bq so ingesting it should give a dose of 3000Sv!(Assuming it takes around 48hours for it to pass through the digestive system)

So how could Cohen make that challange?:confused:
If he is serious he will eat it in a big lump and not grind it up and stir it into his coffee. I don't know where he is going to get 13 grams of Pu so I think he would have to break some laws to do this.

As far as ingesting 13 grams of Pu239, that works out to 13/239 = .054 moles = 3.3x1022atoms. With a half life of 24000 years = 7.7x1011seconds, that works out to about 1010 disintegrations per second or becquerels. If it is in a lump, most of the alpha particles will be absorbed within the lump itself, so only gamma and beta particles will be a problem. I don't think that would kill anyone so long as it passed through in a normal time frame.

AM
 
  • #3
Andrew Mason said:
If he is serious he will eat it in a big lump and not grind it up and stir it into his coffee. I don't know where he is going to get 13 grams of Pu so I think he would have to break some laws to do this.

As far as ingesting 13 grams of Pu239, that works out to 13/239 = .054 moles = 3.3x1022atoms. With a half life of 24000 years = 7.7x1011seconds, that works out to about 1010 disintegrations per second or becquerels. If it is in a lump, most of the alpha particles will be absorbed within the lump itself, so only gamma and beta particles will be a problem. I don't think that would kill anyone so long as it passed through in a normal time frame.
Andrew,

Your analysis is correct.

Because of the short mean free path of the alphas emitted by the Plutonium; only the
Plutonium that is on the surface has ANY chance of doing damage via alphas, which
have the highest damage potential. The damage by alphas is about 20 times greater
per unit dose than electrons or photons.

That's the problem with the "zero-dimensional" analysis where one just computes the
total radioactivity and compares to some Ld50.

The vast majority of the ingested Plutonium is only going to irradiate itself.

Professor Cohen is no dummy; he thought it out.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Last edited:
  • #4
It's 13 grams of PuO2, so taking into account the Oxygen, it's 13/(239 + 32) = 0.048 moles; that has an activity of about 26 GBq.

If he does grind that up, then I'm getting the dose rate using

D = AEavg [MeV / g * s] * 1.6E-13 [J / MeV] * 10E3 [g / kg]

A is activity in Bq per gram
Eavg is average energy of alpha particle

The alpha particle for Pu decay is about 5 MeV and I'm guessing a stomach doesn't weigh more than 3 kg, so using that and the above equation, the dose rate comes out to 0.0069 Gy/s. About 25 Gy in one hour. :bugeye: Did I do that right?
 
  • #5
Ahh so that was what I was missing. I assumed he meant to ingest it as a fine powder, not acctualy swallowing a solid piece of it.
 
  • #6
Send him an email and ask him:
http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/People/Faculty/BL_Cohen.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Rade said:
Send him an email and ask him:
http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/People/Faculty/BL_Cohen.htm
Rade,

I think we ALREADY KNOW the answer from the previous posts.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
Yes the question was answered perfectly :approve: I even bothered to check out the range of 5Mev alpha particles in uranium(could not find it for plutonium but density is similar anyway) and its only and its only 8micrometer. So even thought the ball weights 10grams he would only get effected by a few micrograms on the surface.

To bad no environmentalist has taken up Cohens challange.
 
  • #9
Chemical toxicity

Plutonium is not only dangerous as a radiation source. It also has a chemical toxicity. It is a heavy metal that is likely to be absorbed by the bone surface, and there it can stay for years and release its radiation.

It is the combination of radiation and chemical toxicity that makes Pu so poisonous.

Ingestion of Pu is much less dangerous then ingestion of Po-210, because most of the Pu will be able to leave the body before it can decay (T1/2 for Pu = several years, while T1/2 for Po-210 = 138days)

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium#Toxicity"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Piewie said:
Plutonium is not only dangerous as a radiation source. It also has a chemical toxicity. It is a heavy metal that is likely to be absorbed by the bone surface, and there it can stay for years and release its radiation.

It is the combination of radiation and chemical toxicity that makes Pu so poisonous.

Ingestion of Pu is much less dangerous then ingestion of Po-210, because most of the Pu will be able to leave the body before it can decay (T1/2 for Pu = several years, while T1/2 for Po-210 = 138days)

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium#Toxicity"
It seems to me from this article that the actual toxicity of Pu to humans is not known.

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Toxcicity of Plutonium and Bernard Cohen

What is the toxicity of plutonium?

Plutonium is a highly toxic element that can cause both acute and chronic health effects. It is a radioactive substance and exposure to it can cause damage to cells and tissues, leading to serious health problems.

How does plutonium enter the body?

Plutonium can enter the body through inhalation, ingestion, or absorption through open wounds. Inhalation is the primary route of exposure for workers in nuclear facilities, while ingestion can occur through contaminated food or water. Absorption through open wounds can happen in the case of accidental exposure.

What are the health effects of exposure to plutonium?

Exposure to plutonium can lead to various health effects, including an increased risk of cancer, damage to the lungs, liver, and bone marrow, and adverse reproductive and developmental effects. It can also cause acute radiation sickness in high doses.

Who is most at risk for exposure to plutonium?

Individuals who work in nuclear facilities, handle nuclear materials, or live near nuclear power plants are at the highest risk for exposure to plutonium. Those who come into contact with contaminated soil, water, or food may also be at risk.

What is Bernard Cohen's research on the toxicity of plutonium?

Bernard Cohen was a physicist and professor who conducted extensive research on the toxicity of plutonium. He argued that the health risks of low-level exposure to plutonium were greatly exaggerated and that it was not as dangerous as previously thought. However, his research and findings have been met with criticism and controversy in the scientific community.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top