View Full Version : Laplace Transform Definition
S_David
Oct29-09, 11:17 AM
Hello,
By definition, the forward Laplace transform of a function f(x) is:
\mathcal{L}\left\{f(x)\right\}=\int_0^{\infty}\tex t{e}^{-sx}f(x)\,dx.
Can we say the same for the function f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right), i.e.:
\mathcal{L}\left\{f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right\ }=\int_0^{\infty}\text{e}^{-\frac{s}{x}}f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\,dx.??
Thanks in advance
LCKurtz
Oct29-09, 03:41 PM
No, at least not as you have written it. If g(x) = f(1/x) then
\mathcal{L}(g) = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}g(x)\, dx = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}f(1/x)\, dx
assuming g(x) is of exponential order.
S_David
Oct30-09, 03:14 PM
No, at least not as you have written it. If g(x) = f(1/x) then
\mathcal{L}(g) = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}g(x)\, dx = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}f(1/x)\, dx
assuming g(x) is of exponential order.
Ok, I see. But what do you mean by "exponential order"?
LCKurtz
Oct30-09, 03:29 PM
Ok, I see. But what do you mean by "exponential order"?
A function f is of exponential order if, informally, it grows no faster than an exponential. The definition is there exists a > 0 such that:
\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} |f(t)e^{-at}| = 0
This is the usual condition given to ensure the Laplace transform of f exists.
A function f is of exponential order if, informally, it grows no faster than an exponential. The definition is there exists a > 0 such that:
\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} |f(t)e^{-at}| = 0
This is the usual condition given to ensure the Laplace transform of f exists.
Ok, thanks.
Regards
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.