Quantcast work done
image
Physics Forums Logo
image
image
* Register * Upgrade Blogs Library Staff Rules Mark Forums Read
image
image   image
image

Go Back   Physics Forums > PF Library > Physics > Classical Mechanics > Newtonian Dynamics


Menu
Home
Action
My entries
Subscribe to item
Defined browse
Select

Then Select

Then Select

Search

 
work done

Definition/Summary
Work is a measure of change of energy.

The net work done equals the change in Kinetic Energy (this is the Work-Energy Theorem).

Work is the integral of the scalar product (dot-product) of two vectors: Force and Displacement.

So Work is a scalar (an ordinary number), with dimensions of mass times distance-squared over time-squared.

The SI unit is the amount of Work done by a Force of one newton acting over a displacement of one metre, and is called the joule (J), or newton-metre (N-m).

The SI unit of Power, which is the rate of Work done, is one joule per second, and is called the watt (W).

Equations
Work is the integral of the dot product of force and displacement.

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

For a constant force, work is the dot product of the force with the total displacement.

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

The above work equals the magnitude of the force times the magnitude of the displacement times the cosine of the angle between the force and displacement:

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image


In a uniform gravitational field, Work done by gravity on a body moving along any path C starting at a height Click to see the LaTeX code for this image and ending at a height Click to see the LaTeX code for this image is:

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

In an inverse-square gravitational field, Work done by gravity on a body moving along any path C starting at a height Click to see the LaTeX code for this image and ending at a height Click to see the LaTeX code for this image is:

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

which, if Click to see the LaTeX code for this image is very close to Click to see the LaTeX code for this image, is approximately the same as the previous formula, with Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

Scientists
Sadi Carnot (1796-1832)
James Joule (1818-1889)

Recent forum threads on work done
 
Breakdown
Physics
> Classical Mechanics
>> Newtonian Dynamics

See Also
conservative force
kinetic energy
potential energy
friction
torque

Images

Extended explanation
Conservative Force:

If the work done after a total displacement of zero is zero (so the change in Kinetic Energy is zero), then the force is said to be conservative (for example, friction is not conservative, because a body moving in a full circle under friction loses Kinetic Energy, but gravity is conservative).

For a completely non-conservative force, work equals loss of mechanical energy (the energy lost generally becomes radiation or heat).

Potential energy:

For a conservative force, work done depends only on position and not on the path taken.

Potential energy is another name for work done by a conservative force.

Potential energy depends only on position, and is the work done relative to some arbitrarily-chosen position (the position of zero potential energy, chosen so as to make calculations easy).

For example, in a uniform gravitational field of strength g, when a mass m is moved by any path through a height h, the work done is mgh.

Gearing:

A machine has gearing G if the force out is G times the force in: Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

If no energy is lost, then the work out equals the work in.

Since work equals force times displacement (strictly, the inner product of force and displacement), that means that the displacement of the point of application of the force out is 1/G times the displacement of the point of application of the force in: Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

Conversely, if a system has Click to see the LaTeX code for this image, then Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

For example, the gearing of a lever is the ratio of the lengths of its two "lever arms".
So a lever, or a pulley system, in which the displacement out is less than the displacement in, can lift a heavy object with a force less than its weight.
Derivation of Work-Energy Theorem:

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

Relativistic version:

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image

Commentary

MechaMZ @ 03:34 AM Sep30-09
the "conservative force" link under "see also" at the side bar is broken
~EDIT(tiny-tim): fixed: thanks, MechaMZ!

tiny-tim @ 06:44 PM Mar20-09
Added potential energy is another name for work done by a conservative force.

tiny-tim @ 03:31 AM Dec2-08
Sorry, but I don't see how "net force" can do work, since in the general case the displacements (of the points of application) are different, so there's no such thing as "net displacement" to multiply the "net force" by. Reference to "net force" removed.

robphy @ 11:37 PM Dec1-08
Added "net work" and "Work done by the net force" to the sentence for the Work-Energy theorem in definition/summary section.

tiny-tim @ 09:23 AM Oct17-08
Added relativistic version and its derivation.

tiny-tim @ 01:18 PM Oct13-08
Changed to "Work-Energy Theorem", since that's what everyone on PF seems to call it.

olgranpappy @ 09:36 PM Oct12-08
changed "derivation" in extexpl to "derivation of work kinetic energy theorem".

olgranpappy @ 09:32 PM Oct12-08
corrected inverse square-law force in Equation to actually be inverse *square* law. corrected misstatement regarding size of "heights" at end of Equation section (don't both have to be "small" rather one must be near the other). Corrected definition of Force and following Equations.

tiny-tim @ 04:44 AM Oct12-08
Added derivation, based on suggestion by olgranpappy .

tiny-tim @ 06:34 AM Jul24-08
Ping! Had the bright idea of changing the title from "work (mechanics)" to "work done".
"work (mechanics)" was getting no autolinking at all, but "work done" will get plenty, with virtually no false positives.


Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. © 2009 Physics Forums
Sciam | physorgPhysorg.com Science News Partner
image
image   image