I'm sorry, one more thing. Therefore, assuming if the distance from the start of a punch to the impact pad is 1 meter and the time taken for the punch to reach the impact pad is 0.3 second. The real velocity of the punch will be likely to exceed 3.3 meter per second too?
Sorry it is actually distance divided by time.
The velocity should be 4.9 meter per second if we divided 0.49 meter with 0.1 second, but in the study in the link given the actual speed is 8.9 meter per second which means the distance should be 0.89 meter.
Oh I'm sorry for the mistake, yes it should be distance divided by time. Thus, 4.9 meter per second is more like average velocity and it will be 4.9 meter per second only if the speed or velocity is constant? Sorry, my English is not really good.
Hello,
In this study https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9784821/, the distance the punch travelled from start to impact is 0.49 meters and the time taken from start of punch (that's it, they define the start of punch as the moment the elbow first start to extend) to impact is 0.1...
Hmm... Turns out their value of force known as Franklin as we can see in these videos is invented by the inventor of the measuring device, Kevin Franklin. It is a non-standard force value so I (not just me but everyone except the inventor and the company who made the measuring device) have no...
Sorry, language barrier issue. Is the 'reaction time' which is 132.24 sec or 2.2 minutes the same as the 'the speed at which that force is moving'?
It looks like the 'reaction time' on the Powerkube is the time someone take to throw a strike into the pad as soon as the bell rang as we can see...
In this context involving strikes like punches and kicks, isn't it pushing a 51065 object a foot at one second more appropriate than lifting a 51065 lb object, against gravity, at constant velocity (no acceleration), by 1 foot, within 1 second?
I'm sorry if that sounds ignorant but we...
Moving a 51065 lbs object a foot for 1 second, is that also the same as "a 51065 lb force that is maintained for 1 second over a distance of 1 foot. So elevating a 51065 lb object, against gravity, at constant velocity (no acceleration), by 1 foot, within 1 second would be an example"? Sorry for...
Therefore, 51065 foot pound per second is equal to 94 horsepower according to https://www.xconvert.com/unit-converter/foot-pounds-per-second-to-horsepower-(metric), which is basically the capability to move 51065 lbs object one foot in one second.
Thank you.
I want to compare 51065 foot pound per second to Newton so I can compare its impact force to these punches and kicks here in Newtons https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/12/3/74#:~:text=In terms of impact force,were reported at 122.6 N.
51065 foot pound per second is basically the capability to move...
Sorry the 2kg 1 m 1 sec is a typo, it should be typed as 1 kg 2 m 1 sec. Is that correct? Sorry.
I want to compare the 51065 ft lbs per sec figure to another after it is converted to Newtons. I tried to find online converters where we can convert foot pound per sec figures to Newtons but I only...
Ok, correct me if I'm wrong. 1 newton is equal to 1 kg*1 meter (3 feet 3 inches) per sec per sec, thus is 1 newton equal to 2 kg*1 meter per sec or 46 lbs at 3 feet 3 inches in 1 second?
Or is 1 Newton equals to 1 kg 2 meters per 1 second?
Using an online converter, 51064 foot pounds per...