A question to this part of the paper:
4.2 Importance of Nonlinearities
Apart from the unknown mass configuration in the singularities asa source of spacetime curvature, the nonlinear nature of general relativity also causes curvature to enhance itself, although constrainedby the imposed...
But prevailing understanding can be expanded, in this case by new solutions of the EFE.
I wonder if these have the potential to falsify the field self-interaction proposed by Deur, as Seifert states in the abstract "In particular, the solutions presented here result in flat rotation curves...
The Importance of Being Symmetric: Flat Rotation Curves from Exact Axisymmetric Static Vacuum Spacetimes
... Analyzing the low-velocity limitcorresponding to the Newtonian approximation of the Schwarzschild metric, we find an effective logarithmic potential. Thisyields flat rotation curves for...
Not sure if I understand that correctly.
The "break down" of GR at r=0 requires an extension of the theory such that these infinities are avoided.
If you say we "don't know if it is possible or not" do you say we don't know if such an extension exisits or we will never be able to write it...
But at least experimental support for inflation would support the L-CDM model and thus postulates like homogeneity on which this model is based, right?
What could prove "that the universe must be homogeneous (on large enough distance scales)"?
Would the detection of primordial gravitational waves be a prove? If that proves the correctness of the inflationary theory then I think that even if the creation of matter particles at the end of...
"100-0 is what we calculate from the post-collapse wave function." Isn't 100-0 just the measurement outcome which verifies one of the two possibilities "offered" by the wave function?
But isn't an update of the math something else and not comparable to the instantaneous contraction of a physical thing to a point?
In other words doesn't the measurement just confirm spin up.
Why can't we argue that the wavefunction is not a physical object but 'just' a mathematical expression which describes probabilities and which per se isn't observable? Then it wouldn't be too hard to conclude, that such an expression doesn't collapse.
Here comes Ulrich Bastian's comment, he is one of the founding fathers of Gaia:
My translation:
It seems most probably the trace of a satellite. It begins in the middle of the image and from there sloping to the bottom. It is parallel to the second satellite trace, not shown here. The wobble...
Saying "notice" you seem to think of tidal force or spaghettification. Yes, the larger the black hole the less you feel it, as already said in #4. The reason is tidal force goes with 1/M².