- #1
BDOA
- 31
- 0
Hi, i just completed my paper looking the posibility that neutrinos feel an additional force
added to the standard model. The force is based upon U(1) just like the electromagnetic
force, but left and right handed particles have opposite charges. The paper is available
below, and at my web site: http://www.geocities.com/ch1rality/
I'm looking for an endorsment so i can upload to this to arXiv, and help with publishing the
work in some professional physics journal .
As required by the forum rules, i'll post the abstract, and run though the stages in
my derivations, and comparisions to observation.
Abstract:
We show that when left and right handed neutrinos a have majorana mass matrix,
local gauge invariance produces a fifth force acting between chiral charges on neutrinos and quarks.
The force is a carried by a massless (or low mass) 1-spin gauge boson, we call an axiphoton.
The force is caused by a U(1) axial gauge symmetry in the way as the electromagnetic force.
We expect from renormalisation that the force constant, $\alpha_a$
is about 1/60 of the electromagnetic force constant $\alpha$.
We show that this force can explain dark energy.
Our model predicts decaying right handed neutrinos in the eV-MeV range, and explain the heating of the solar corona.
Finally we show that the Tajmar experiment detecting a force due to a
rotating superconductor, may be detection of our force.
End Abstract
Prior work:
The only clear derivation of an axial force, i can find previously, is L.M. Slads paper
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0512324
Which derives the same axial force, by requiring the weak force be part of group that
respects the full orthochronous Lorentz systemmetry. I.e. that is not enough just to
have a right hand and left hand weak force, to return chiral symmetry, a axial force is
also required to return full symmetry in all frames. J.C. Yoon who posted in these forums
about the weak force not being Lorentz invariant, might like to read the above paper.
Discription of the paper
Theory sections
My paper, derives the axial force, purely from gauge invariance. I then derive a 8 complex
component wave equation for the neutrino, by extending the dirac equation. I show this
wave equation gives neutrino states with constant helicity. And the derive the force on
and energy of a neutrino the axial field. I write down the Feynman rules for the axial
force, and compute neutrino-neutrino scattering (which is very surpressed at high energies),
and the decay of a right handed neutrino.
Reprocussions for the standard model
Assuming axial charges are conserved, i calculate the axial charges on the other particles
in the standard model. The W particle has to carry both electric and axial charges, and
this seem to offer an explanation for the first time as to why the weak force is handed.
I find that the number of quarks per generation needs to double in order to accomdiate
axial charges. And speculate weather those states could explain the [tex]\sigma(555)[\tex]
meson state. I also discuss how the states may fit into strings theorists favourite
E8, E7, and E6 groups. Finally conservaton of the axial charge seems
to demand absolute proton stability.
Comparisions to observations
I first find that ordinary matter may be axial charged depending upon the ammout of
neutron and proton it nucleii. To balance this a sea of neutrinos must be present in
most matter types. Pauli exclusion require neutrinos (presumibly right hand states) in the
eV-KeV mass range. I use these to provide a mechanism for the heating of the solar
corona. I show that plasma screening of axial force by sea neutrinos will then make the
force unobservible to most existing experiments. However i show that the Tajmar
experiment might be a detection of the axial force.
I find that a dense plasma of neutrino may resist anhilition, and show this may explain
dark energy if the lightest neutrino has a mass of around 0.14 milli-eV.
51 papers and 45 reference.
End Paper discription
Let me know what you think. In particular are there any obvious math errors in my theory
section, (show stoppers?). And are the any places i haven't thought of, where the axial
force might contradict existing observations?
Even if no observation requires the existence of an axial force. I still think my paper and
the idea deserve to be in physics literature, as it is a simple extention to the standard
model, that adds symmetry to nature, and offers an explanation of the weak force
handedness and of the stablity of the proton.
Also where might be an appriopiate journal to submit this work to?
added to the standard model. The force is based upon U(1) just like the electromagnetic
force, but left and right handed particles have opposite charges. The paper is available
below, and at my web site: http://www.geocities.com/ch1rality/
I'm looking for an endorsment so i can upload to this to arXiv, and help with publishing the
work in some professional physics journal .
As required by the forum rules, i'll post the abstract, and run though the stages in
my derivations, and comparisions to observation.
Abstract:
We show that when left and right handed neutrinos a have majorana mass matrix,
local gauge invariance produces a fifth force acting between chiral charges on neutrinos and quarks.
The force is a carried by a massless (or low mass) 1-spin gauge boson, we call an axiphoton.
The force is caused by a U(1) axial gauge symmetry in the way as the electromagnetic force.
We expect from renormalisation that the force constant, $\alpha_a$
is about 1/60 of the electromagnetic force constant $\alpha$.
We show that this force can explain dark energy.
Our model predicts decaying right handed neutrinos in the eV-MeV range, and explain the heating of the solar corona.
Finally we show that the Tajmar experiment detecting a force due to a
rotating superconductor, may be detection of our force.
End Abstract
Prior work:
The only clear derivation of an axial force, i can find previously, is L.M. Slads paper
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0512324
Which derives the same axial force, by requiring the weak force be part of group that
respects the full orthochronous Lorentz systemmetry. I.e. that is not enough just to
have a right hand and left hand weak force, to return chiral symmetry, a axial force is
also required to return full symmetry in all frames. J.C. Yoon who posted in these forums
about the weak force not being Lorentz invariant, might like to read the above paper.
Discription of the paper
Theory sections
My paper, derives the axial force, purely from gauge invariance. I then derive a 8 complex
component wave equation for the neutrino, by extending the dirac equation. I show this
wave equation gives neutrino states with constant helicity. And the derive the force on
and energy of a neutrino the axial field. I write down the Feynman rules for the axial
force, and compute neutrino-neutrino scattering (which is very surpressed at high energies),
and the decay of a right handed neutrino.
Reprocussions for the standard model
Assuming axial charges are conserved, i calculate the axial charges on the other particles
in the standard model. The W particle has to carry both electric and axial charges, and
this seem to offer an explanation for the first time as to why the weak force is handed.
I find that the number of quarks per generation needs to double in order to accomdiate
axial charges. And speculate weather those states could explain the [tex]\sigma(555)[\tex]
meson state. I also discuss how the states may fit into strings theorists favourite
E8, E7, and E6 groups. Finally conservaton of the axial charge seems
to demand absolute proton stability.
Comparisions to observations
I first find that ordinary matter may be axial charged depending upon the ammout of
neutron and proton it nucleii. To balance this a sea of neutrinos must be present in
most matter types. Pauli exclusion require neutrinos (presumibly right hand states) in the
eV-KeV mass range. I use these to provide a mechanism for the heating of the solar
corona. I show that plasma screening of axial force by sea neutrinos will then make the
force unobservible to most existing experiments. However i show that the Tajmar
experiment might be a detection of the axial force.
I find that a dense plasma of neutrino may resist anhilition, and show this may explain
dark energy if the lightest neutrino has a mass of around 0.14 milli-eV.
51 papers and 45 reference.
End Paper discription
Let me know what you think. In particular are there any obvious math errors in my theory
section, (show stoppers?). And are the any places i haven't thought of, where the axial
force might contradict existing observations?
Even if no observation requires the existence of an axial force. I still think my paper and
the idea deserve to be in physics literature, as it is a simple extention to the standard
model, that adds symmetry to nature, and offers an explanation of the weak force
handedness and of the stablity of the proton.
Also where might be an appriopiate journal to submit this work to?