Greg Bernhardt said:
I can't believe there are policemen out there that wanted to 'attach a GPS tracking unit to someone's vehicle' without a warrent or consent by the owner of the vehicle. They forget about American democracy! United we stand!WhoWee said:
The Supreme Court ruling on GPS tracking requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant before using GPS tracking devices to monitor a suspect's movements.
The Supreme Court made this ruling to protect individuals' Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.
There are certain exceptions to this ruling, such as in emergency situations where there is a risk of harm to others or when there is a reasonable belief that the suspect is a flight risk.
This ruling may make it more difficult for law enforcement to track suspects using GPS devices without a warrant, but they still have other methods of tracking, such as physical surveillance or obtaining a warrant for other types of tracking.
This ruling may have implications for other types of electronic surveillance, as it sets a precedent for requiring a warrant for tracking activities. However, each case will still be evaluated on its own merits.