Inductor/coil/choke design confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter engineerting
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Design
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around confusion regarding different equations for calculating maximum flux density (Bmax) in inductor design. One equation uses the root mean square (Vrms) voltage, while the other employs the voltage across the inductor (Vl) and the supply voltage (Vss). Variations in these equations may stem from different circuit contexts, such as AC versus DC applications. It is crucial to understand the assumptions behind each formula and to validate their accuracy for specific designs. Consulting with colleagues or experts in the field is recommended for clarity on these design parameters.
engineerting
2
0
Hello all,
i have an equation for flux density taking the inductor chrecteristics into account as

Bmax= (Vrms * 10^8)/(4.44*A*N*f)

but the company i work for has given it at

Bmax=(Vl * 10^4)/(4.44*A*N*Vss)

where Vl = voltage across inductor.

i am finding a lot of variation for equations for the paratmeters of inductor/choke design.

i was wonderign if someone could shed light light on this confusion??

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You would need to define the symbols in those formulae first. Is the second formula just for a particular circuit? (Vss seems to be a supply voltage?)
What's the background to this?
 
engineerting said:
Hello all,
i have an equation for flux density taking the inductor chrecteristics into account as

Bmax= (Vrms * 10^8)/(4.44*A*N*f)

but the company i work for has given it at

Bmax=(Vl * 10^4)/(4.44*A*N*Vss)

where Vl = voltage across inductor.

i am finding a lot of variation for equations for the paratmeters of inductor/choke design.

i was wonderign if someone could shed light light on this confusion??

thanks

sophiecentaur said:
You would need to define the symbols in those formulae first. Is the second formula just for a particular circuit? (Vss seems to be a supply voltage?)
What's the background to this?

Vrms = rms of supply (what i understood this to be)
A = cross section of core
N= number of turns of coil
f= frequency of supply
Vss = supply voltage

the equations given to me for choke design work but are not accurate so i started to search around for an answer. there are lot of variations in the equations and also for Inductance i found the same thing.
 
The formula you have been given must be making assumptions about the frequency being used and, I guess, is supposed to make life easier for you to get an answer. It looks totally wrong and it is not 'dimensionally correct' because there is a V, top and bottom. But it may work in the particular context that they want you to work.
I should ask your boss what to do, if that's acceptable in your organisation. He is paid to sort that sort of thing out (?).
 


I can understand your confusion and the variations in equations for inductor/choke design. The equations you have provided are different, but they both relate to the maximum flux density (Bmax) in the inductor. The first equation takes into account the root mean square (Vrms) voltage, while the second equation uses the voltage across the inductor (Vl). Additionally, the second equation includes the voltage source (Vss) in its calculation.

Both equations have their own assumptions and limitations, and it is important to understand the context in which each one is used. The first equation may be more suitable for AC circuits, while the second equation may be more applicable in DC circuits.

To shed more light on this confusion, I suggest looking into the source of each equation and understanding the underlying principles and assumptions. It may also be helpful to consult with colleagues or experts in the field for their insights and experiences with inductor/choke design.

Overall, it is important to carefully consider and validate the equations used in any design process, and to understand the limitations and assumptions associated with them. This will help ensure the accuracy and effectiveness of the design.
 
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Back
Top