Pythagoras' Perfect Ratios: Uncovering the Base 10 Anomaly

Click For Summary
A 49-year study reveals a significant anomaly in the Base 10 number system, linked to Pythagorean ratios (0:1:1:2:3:4) and their relation to the area of circles. The formula 9^2 (10) (DD) is introduced, where 9 represents the diameter, (10) signifies Base 10, and (DD) denotes the degree-distance between angular degrees of a circle. This formula consistently yields the area for any diameter, demonstrating a universal application of the Base 10 system. Examples illustrate this with various diameters, confirming the anomaly's validity. The discussion invites further exploration and understanding of these mathematical concepts.
Robust
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Base 10 Anomaly

An applied 49-year study into the origin of pi and the Base 10 number system resulted in the finding of a highly anomalous formula. Essentially, the finding derives from the perfect ratios (0:1:1:2:3:4) given by Pythagoras who we know studied and perhaps taught in the Babylonian temples of learning. Unquestionably the cipher given of his perfect ratios relates of Base 10 - all cardinal numbers of the system relating of diameter to the circular plane. Here is the formula succinctly given - you can take it from there.

9^2 (10) (DD) = area; where 9 is culmination to Base 10 and diameter of circle; (10) is Base 10 (recognized by Pythagoras as given by the cipher); (DD) is the degree-distance between each angular degree of the 360-degree circumference, given as pi/40 for the diameter of 9. The anomaly is seen where the degree-distance as given by the diameter applies to giving the area to a circumference of any diameter whatsoever. Here are several examples, noting that the DD to a diameter of 9 is employed in every instance:

9^2 (10) (0.07853...) = 63.6172...area;
8^2 (10) (0.07853...) = 50.2654...area;
7^2 (10) (0.07853...) = 38.4845...area; etc., and for any diameter whatsoever.

Like Root 2, Base 10 rules.

"All things number and harmony." - Pythagoras
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eh? Could someone explain this or give a link to read to make sense of it please.
 
Zurtex said:
Eh? Could someone explain this or give a link to read to make sense of it please.
Hi, Zurtex! What is there about it you would like to know? I'll help as I can.
 
Dondes back!
 
Rubbish.

- Warren
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K