Hydrino's and Blacklight Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulhunn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary
Dr. Randall Mills' theory on hydrinos, which suggests a new form of hydrogen with unique energy release properties, faces skepticism due to its lack of empirical support and the absence of detectable signatures. Critics highlight fundamental flaws in the theory, questioning the existence of hydrinos and their implications for chemical bonding. Recent discussions have surged following media coverage, but no new scientific advancements have been reported. Concerns are raised about Blacklight Power's financial stability and potential motives for attracting new investors amid ongoing skepticism. The overall sentiment is one of doubt regarding the validity and reproducibility of Mills' claims.

New theory Scientific revoloution or utter rubbish?

  • Brilliant, will solve all of our energy needs and change the world!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cant happen as it violates Quantum Theory.

    Votes: 3 100.0%

  • Total voters
    3
paulhunn
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
Pretty funny theory, since it has so many simple things "wrong" with it. Like... why hasn't anyone every noticed "hydrinos" before, since their signature energy should be so easy to detect? What do you do with a hydrino once you get one, since presumably they are no longer eligible for forming chemical bonds? etc. I always wonder when someone comes up with a theory that is so easily falsified... oh, and is accompanied by experimental claims that can't (won't) be reproducible.
 
.. and the fact that Randy himself hasn't experimentally seen the hydrino energy level.

We seem to have a FLOOD of this all of the sudden after some free advertisement that this thing received in the UK. Why is that? There has been no new progress being reported. There's nothing new that we don't know already out of this report. Is Blacklight trying to get new suckers... er... I mean new investors since they're slowly running out of money with nothing to show?

Zz.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K