- #1
alialice
- 51
- 0
We consider a superfield [itex]\Phi[/itex][itex]\left(x^{\mu}, \theta_{\alpha}\right)[/itex].
For a small variation [itex]\delta \Phi [/itex] = [itex] \bar{\epsilon} Q \Phi [/itex]
where the supercharge [itex]Q_{\alpha}[/itex] is given by:
[itex]Q_{\alpha}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{\theta}^{\alpha}}[/itex]-[itex]\left(\gamma^{\mu} \theta \right) _{\alpha} \partial _{\mu}[/itex]
They satisfy the algebra:
[itex]\left\{ Q_{\alpha}, Q_{\beta} \right\}[/itex] = -2[itex]\left( \gamma^{\mu} C \right)_{\alpha \beta} \partial_{\mu} [/itex]
where C is the charge coniugation matrix.
How can I demonstrate this? The exercise is to calculate explicitely the anticommutator.
Can you help me please?
Thank you very much!
For a small variation [itex]\delta \Phi [/itex] = [itex] \bar{\epsilon} Q \Phi [/itex]
where the supercharge [itex]Q_{\alpha}[/itex] is given by:
[itex]Q_{\alpha}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{\theta}^{\alpha}}[/itex]-[itex]\left(\gamma^{\mu} \theta \right) _{\alpha} \partial _{\mu}[/itex]
They satisfy the algebra:
[itex]\left\{ Q_{\alpha}, Q_{\beta} \right\}[/itex] = -2[itex]\left( \gamma^{\mu} C \right)_{\alpha \beta} \partial_{\mu} [/itex]
where C is the charge coniugation matrix.
How can I demonstrate this? The exercise is to calculate explicitely the anticommutator.
Can you help me please?
Thank you very much!