Calculate torque of an 80kg object rotating on its central axis

In summary, the setup is for a bowl-shaped object that sits on ball bearings to rotate. The object is 80 kg and the motor is needed to rotate it at 4-5 rpm.
  • #36
Running dry.

The specs again:
NEMA 17 Planetary Geared Stepper Motor
Weight = 0.5Kg
Rated Voltage = 12V DC
Rated Current = 0.4A DC
Rotor Inertia = 35gcm2
Holding Torque before gearbox = 26Ncm

Gearbox:
Gear ratio = 26 (103/121)
Max. Permissible Torque = 3Nm
Moment Permissible Torque = 5Nm
Shaft maximum Axial load = 50N
Shaft maximum Radial load = 100N
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #37
At this point I have to admit that I am pretty much stumped.

I reviewed your application related to an SKF standard angular load ball bearing unit with a 200 mm bore diameter and the result is still about the same as your calculated value and well below you rated 5Nm torque capability with a 90kg load. They did give an alert that the minimum speed for good bearing oil lubricant distribution should be 12 rpm. I suggest you might try lubricating your bearings to see if that improves the situation; but, apart from that it would appear that you bearings should not be creating any torque friction for you; and I cannot think of any other factors, particularly at the very low 5kg load that appears to be your present limit. The only other thing I might suggest is that you run a static torque test on your NEMA 17 unit to see if it meets its published torque capability.
 
  • #38
Earlier you said the system exists. So why not put an 80Kg weight on it and just measure the starting torque a few times? Perhaps add a factor of 2 or 3 for safety/wear. To measure the torque add a lever arm, pulley, and rope with a pan. Add weights to the pan until it moves. Disconnect the motor and gearbox for the test.
 
  • #39
Okay, thank you I will try to see what I can do.
Thanks for all the help.
 
  • #40
There is nothing to stop that assembly as drawn from running badly crooked . Most of the problems with getting it started in rotation probably come from getting it unstuck from a random resting position unfavourable for starting .

If you just want a turntable driven by a motor then there are far better ways of doing it . We can talk about that in detail if you wish but surely a central shaft with an arrangement of conventional bearings is what is really needed ?

A large diameter thrust bearing is unlikely to be necessary but if you must have one then just use a single ready made one ?

If you tell us what you are actually trying to do with this turntable we may between us on PF be able to suggest a nice simple solution .
 
  • #41
Hi,
Thanks, it's just the the entire mechanism involves a few gears and things like that as well, and it's quite complex so I'd rather avoid getting into that since we haven't even figured out the simple stuff.

I think i'll try to buy a much bigger motor and see what it can do for now :)

Thanks.
 
  • #42
At this point I am going to risk stepping way out of my realm of knowledge; but, based upon your supplied data the selected motor should be able to provide sufficient torque to easily rotate more than your 5 kg weight at your very low speed. So are you sure you have the correct driver and hookup for this motor?
 
  • #43
Yes I'm positive. I haven't measured it, it was just an object I placed on top so it was around 5kg I think. I'll probably just order a bigger motor and test it.
 

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top