Different understanding of the universe if .

  • Thread starter Low-Q
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Universe
In summary, if humans were the size of a pinhead, they would have a different understanding of the universe and the smallest known particles. If humans were the size of the Earth, they would have the same understanding of the universe and the smallest known particles.
  • #1
Low-Q
Gold Member
284
9
I have thought about something for a while now, and wondered if we would have a different understanding of the universe, and the smallest known particle, if we humans were smaller or larger.
What if we humans was at the size of a pinhead (And maintained the same brain capacity as normal sized humans). How would we understand the universe, and how would we understand the smallest particles?
What if humans was at the size of the Earth (And maintained the same brain capacity as a normal sized human). What would our understanding of the universe, and the smallest particles be?

The precicion of our instruments would differ a lot I assume. Taking that into account, we would probably have two very different "trouth" about the universe and its origin.

This thread is meant as a think tank, or similar. Just for curiosity.
If it doesn't fit into this section of the forum, or doesn't fit into the forum at all, please let me know.

Vidar
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
That's a bit like asking "if unicorns existed, would we want to pet them?"

Certainly the size/speed of human experience is a factor in our "common sense / intuition / etc" and makes it hard to grasp some of the principles of cosmology and Quantum Mechanics because they are so utterly outside our range of experience and thus are things the knowledge of which has had zero survival value as humans evolved and I believe that's your point.
 
  • #3
Hey the question about petting unicorns could turn out to be important if you meet one : )
That aside I suspect that there is a fairly narrow range of size that is compatible with something like human experience, and it can be interesting as a thought experiment to ponder "what would a sentient creature experience if it were the size of a bacterium - or of a solar system ? " though we quicly run into impossibilities - e.g. nothing the size of an atom could have the required complexity, etc - but the nature of such impossibilities is interesting too...

</Random pseudo-philosophical musings>
 

Related to Different understanding of the universe if .

1. What would be the biggest difference in our understanding of the universe if Earth were flat?

If Earth were actually flat, it would have a significant impact on our understanding of the universe. We would have to reject the well-established concept of a spherical Earth and all of the evidence that supports it. Additionally, our understanding of gravity and the laws of physics would have to be reevaluated.

2. How would our understanding of the universe change if we discovered extraterrestrial life?

The discovery of extraterrestrial life would revolutionize our understanding of the universe. It would confirm that life can exist beyond Earth and open up new possibilities for space exploration and the search for habitable planets. It would also raise new questions about the origins of life and the potential for intelligent life elsewhere.

3. What if the speed of light was not the fastest speed in the universe?

Our current understanding of the universe is built upon the assumption that the speed of light is the fastest speed possible. If this were not the case, it would challenge many of our fundamental laws of physics and could potentially lead to new theories and discoveries. It would also have implications for space travel and our understanding of time and space.

4. How would our understanding of the universe change if the Big Bang theory was proven false?

The Big Bang theory is currently the most widely accepted explanation for the origins of the universe. If it were proven false, it would require us to reevaluate our understanding of the universe's beginning and possibly lead to new theories and explanations. It would also raise questions about the nature of space and time and the concept of a multiverse.

5. What if dark matter and dark energy did not exist?

Dark matter and dark energy are currently believed to make up the majority of the universe, but their exact nature and existence are still a mystery. If they were proven not to exist, it would require us to come up with new explanations for the observations and phenomena that are currently attributed to them. It could also change our understanding of the structure and evolution of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
748
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
0
Views
769
Back
Top