GUT Unifying Underlying Fields: Is It Beyond the Standard Model?

In summary: Theoretically, there could be more particles in the universe, but they would all be variants of the ones we know. And as far as we know, the forces are completely unified so there wouldn't be a place for new "things" - they would just be new manifestations of the fields we already have.
  • #1
jnorman
316
0
i understand GUT to be an effort to unify the 3 (4) basic forces - gravity, EM and electro-weak, and strong. however, i also read that the standard model is not actually a theory of particles - it is a field theory, in that particles are accepted as manifestations of fields, rather than actual "things" - is this correct?.

so, is GUT actually an effort to unify the basic fields found in the universe, rahter than an effort to unify the forces which result from the fields? if so, how would one fit in such other potential fields such as the higgs field? (i don't actually see a place in the standard model for a higgs field - where does it fit? is is another type of force?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
jnorman said:
i understand GUT to be an effort to unify the 3 (4) basic forces - gravity, EM and electro-weak, and strong. however, i also read that the standard model is not actually a theory of particles - it is a field theory, in that particles are accepted as manifestations of fields, rather than actual "things" - is this correct?.

Electromagnetism and weak force have already been unified (this brings about the Higgs mechanism and is included in the standard model). The mathematical description of standard model is indeed what is known as quantum field theory, describing particles (both matter and force carriers) as excitations of fields.

jnorman said:
so, is GUT actually an effort to unify the basic fields found in the universe, rahter than an effort to unify the forces which result from the fields?

What's the difference?

jnorman said:
if so, how would one fit in such other potential fields such as the higgs field? (i don't actually see a place in the standard model for a higgs field - where does it fit? is is another type of force?)

The standard model does not explain the fields it contains. It's just a theoretical construction that seems to describe everything we see around us - it does not predict for example the number of quarks or their masses, these are all just experimentally verified "facts of life".

The Higgs field is what causes electromagnetism and weak force to be different - it gives masses to the weak force carriers, while photon remains massless. There is no mathematically consistent way of combining these two forces into one, while still explaining why they are so different without Higgs or something very close to it. That's why it's added to the ingredient list, even though no one has actually seen one yet.

Can you explain what you mean by "room"? Why would there not be room for new particles?
 

Related to GUT Unifying Underlying Fields: Is It Beyond the Standard Model?

1. What is the "GUT Unifying Underlying Fields" theory?

The "GUT Unifying Underlying Fields" theory, also known as Grand Unified Theory, is a proposed theory in physics that aims to unify the three fundamental forces of nature: the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and electromagnetism. It suggests that at extremely high energies, these forces are actually different manifestations of a single unified force.

2. Is this theory supported by evidence?

There is currently no direct evidence for the "GUT Unifying Underlying Fields" theory, as it has not been experimentally verified. However, it is a mathematically elegant solution to some of the unanswered questions in particle physics, and is supported by certain indirect observations, such as the unification of the strong and weak nuclear forces at high energies.

3. How does this theory relate to the Standard Model?

The Standard Model of particle physics is a well-established theory that describes the behavior of all known particles and their interactions. The "GUT Unifying Underlying Fields" theory goes beyond the Standard Model by attempting to unify the three fundamental forces of nature and provide a more complete understanding of the fundamental building blocks of the universe.

4. What are the implications of this theory?

If the "GUT Unifying Underlying Fields" theory is confirmed, it would be a major breakthrough in our understanding of the fundamental forces of nature. It would also have implications for our understanding of the early universe and potentially help explain phenomena such as the origin of dark matter and the matter-antimatter asymmetry.

5. Are there any challenges or criticisms of this theory?

One of the main challenges of the "GUT Unifying Underlying Fields" theory is that it has not yet been experimentally tested. Some critics also argue that it is a highly complex theory that requires additional assumptions and equations to work, making it less elegant than the Standard Model. Additionally, there is currently no consensus on which specific GUT model is the correct one, making it difficult to make definitive predictions or testable hypotheses.

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
270
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
912
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top