If BH do not exist, would string & LQG be falsified?

  • Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Lqg String
In summary: Dark energy stars do not follow the usual entropy laws and undergo a phase transition from solid to liquid. This does not falsify string theory or LQG, but does corroborate them.
  • #1
ensabah6
695
0
If Black holes do not exist, would string & LQG be falsified?

Suppose that black holes do not exist in nature, in that the quantum properties of matter prevents density from increasing beyond a certain limit, as well as gravity's strength diminishing at higher energies. Stellar objects can collapse up to a certain density before new previously unknown physics takes over. GR becomes invalid a description of BH beyond a certain range of distances.

One paper for example,
http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0503/0503200.pdf
speaks of dark energy stars


There is no hawking radiation as they apply to BH, no information loss. "Dark stars" follow the usual entropy laws, adding energy increases its heat, losing energy cools it off (BH follow the reverse) Instead of singularities and infinite densities, dark stars undergo a phase transition analogous from solid to liquid.

If the above were true, would it falsify string theory and LQG, which of course, both predict BH's (but not dark energy stars) and BH entropy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, on the contrary, it would tend to corroborate string theory, since what is called black hole there is actually a "fuzzy sphere", which is closer to what you are thinking.
 
  • #3
LQG does not predict black holes in the usual sense. It associates an entropy to a quantum object analogous to a black whole, which has some unusual properties. As far as I know the eqations of LQG are not fully solved for BHs, so one has to deal with approximations; the most common one in which dynamics can be studied to a certain extent is to restrict to the subspace of spherical symmetric solutions. This theory with a finite number of degrees of freedom is called LQG (C for cosmology). One central prediction is that gravity induces a repulsive force to matter degrees of freedom at small distances avoiding the collaps to a singularity (applies to the big crunch as well which is replaced by a big bounce). The quantum gravity repulsion becomes important below ~ 100 * Planck Length; in the long distance limit the theory reproduces well-known spherical symmetric solutions of GR.

So as a summary there should be objects in full LQG which correspond to black hole. They should have an event horizon, but no singularity.
 

Related to If BH do not exist, would string & LQG be falsified?

1. What is BH and how does it relate to string and LQG theories?

BH stands for black holes, which are objects with such strong gravitational pull that not even light can escape from them. Both string theory and loop quantum gravity (LQG) attempt to explain the behavior of gravity at a fundamental level, and both have implications for the existence of black holes.

2. Why would the non-existence of BHs falsify string theory and LQG?

In string theory, black holes play a crucial role in reconciling the theory with general relativity. The theory predicts the existence of certain types of black holes, and if these do not exist, it would mean that the predictions of string theory are incorrect. Similarly, LQG also makes predictions about the behavior of black holes, and if these predictions are not supported by observations, it would cast doubt on the validity of the theory.

3. Are there any other implications if BHs do not exist?

Yes, the non-existence of black holes would have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. For example, it would challenge the current understanding of the formation of galaxies and the role of dark matter. It would also raise questions about the validity of general relativity and the need for a new theory of gravity.

4. Can we definitively prove or disprove the existence of BHs?

At the moment, we do not have the technology or observational capabilities to definitively prove or disprove the existence of black holes. However, scientists are constantly working to develop new methods and technologies to study and observe these objects, which may one day provide more conclusive evidence.

5. How does the debate about the existence of BHs impact the scientific community?

The debate about the existence of black holes is an ongoing and important discussion within the scientific community. It highlights the need for further research and investigation into the nature of gravity and the fundamental laws of the universe. It also demonstrates the importance of constantly questioning and testing our current theories and understanding of the world around us.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
750
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Back
Top