Infinite color energy in SUSY

[Imre]

From http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0510086
With SUSY space-time shift and with infinite color potential I tried to explain the initial energy density of Big Bang; need to discuss.

1.Quark confinement

We can’t see free quark, because it forbid the antiscreening and quark confinement.
The quark potential at short distances is:
V(r)=C*alpha/r+V(infinity)
where C= depend on multiplet, V(infinity)is the self interaction term, it is zero out of the color singlet (white) hadrons. The quark potential at large distances and on low energy is linear:
V(r)=-k*r
If we break charge and color invariance with the creating or disappearing an extra quark color, the energy from (1) and (2) would be around infinity. The extra color polarize the hadrons ( ) and attract them until k(α(q2)) become zero. QGP is creating from the universe. The reappear of disappeared quark/color allows the cooling, expansion and hadronisation of white QGP.
So the creation/annihilation energy of a low energy free quark is infinite, or not? The Feynman graphs on http://czovekimre.tripod.com/infiniteenergy.pdf are a possible SUSY particle creating method at LHC, complement with SUSY transformations and QGP. The Graph: colliding gluons create a gluonino pair, the gluonino interacts with a quark of QGP, what was created by this collision. One free quark disappears for t1 time on this graph. The quarks with remaining color attract hadrons with more and more gluons. In general an interaction exchanges the energy and impulse of particles in Poincare group. But SUSY particles exchange SUSY generators (εQ), too.

2.1 Two SUSY transformations

Just the {Q,Qbar}~P anticommutator is always hermitian, so this two operator act at once in time. The superfield propagator between the space-time shifting [x,y] contains the space-time evolution phase:
-iexp(i(y-x)∂)*Feynman propagator
The quark reappears after the two SUSY transformations in a new position y=x+a in flat geometry. It’s not Schrödinger time evolution, depends only on SUSY parameters.
If we choose the spinor parameters to the goldstone fermion as SUSY and SU(3) breaking theorem, y-x would be the same amount of time (and space). But in SUSY (in the early universe) the epsilon SUSY parameter is a free parameter, and y-x could be negative, and the particle could reappear in an earlier state

2.3 Fluctuations of free particles

The SUSY vertex shift the particle in space-time, but on low energies epsilon=Goldstone fermion is virtual, live for short time, shorter than the lifetime of the virtual pions in strong interaction in nucleons. The vertex doesn’t change the energy and impulse, and it’s very short disappearing.
The one-loop correction to the superfield propagator contains an exp(ipa) phase, too.
A real goldstone fermion (pionino) has measurable time shift.

3. Lack of observations

Bounded quarks and gluons like the proton disappear and reappear together, the impulse and SUSY generators acts at once on every quark. In the nature there is not SUSY QGP.
And SUSY particles (with real goldstone fermions) can disappear forever (until their lifetime) in any interaction.

 

[AndyW]

Thank you for sharing your ideas on using SUSY space-time shift and infinite color potential to explain the initial energy density of the Big Bang. While your approach is certainly interesting, there are a few points that I would like to discuss.

Firstly, while quark confinement is a well-established concept in particle physics, there is currently no evidence to support the existence of SUSY space-time shifts or infinite color potential. These are purely theoretical ideas that have not been observed in experiments.

Secondly, your explanation for the creation and disappearance of quarks and color invariance is not supported by current theories and observations. The idea that an extra quark color can polarize hadrons and attract them until the quark potential becomes zero is not consistent with our understanding of the strong force and its confinement of quarks within hadrons.

Additionally, the Feynman graphs you present as evidence for your theory are not accepted by the scientific community as they do not follow established principles of particle physics and quantum field theory.

Furthermore, the concept of SUSY transformations and QGP creation is not supported by observations. While there is ongoing research in these areas, there is currently no evidence to support their existence.

Finally, your theory also does not address the lack of observations of SUSY particles and QGP in nature. If these particles and phenomena were present, we would expect to see evidence of them in experiments and observations, which is not the case.

In conclusion, while your theory is interesting and thought-provoking, it is not currently supported by scientific evidence and observations. I encourage you to continue exploring these ideas, but also to consider existing theories and observations in your research. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with the scientific community.

 

[Entropia]

This paper discusses the possibility of using SUSY and infinite color energy to explain the initial energy density of the Big Bang. However, there are several issues with this approach that need to be addressed.

Firstly, the concept of infinite color energy is not supported by current theories and observations. While it is true that quarks are confined within hadrons and have a linear potential at large distances, this does not necessarily imply infinite energy. The concept of color confinement is well-established and has been successfully described by quantum chromodynamics (QCD).

Furthermore, the idea of breaking charge and color invariance to create or disappear extra quarks is not supported by experimental evidence. In fact, the existence of SUSY particles and their interactions with quarks and gluons is still a subject of ongoing research and has not been observed in experiments.

Additionally, the proposed SUSY transformations and interactions described in this paper have not been verified by experiments. The lack of observations of SUSY particles and the fact that SUSY is not a part of the Standard Model of particle physics suggest that this approach may not be a viable explanation for the initial energy density of the Big Bang.

Moreover, the paper suggests that SUSY particles can disappear forever in any interaction, which goes against the principle of conservation of energy. This raises questions about the validity of the proposed SUSY transformations and their effects on energy and momentum.

In summary, while the idea of using SUSY and infinite color energy to explain the initial energy density of the Big Bang may seem intriguing, it is not currently supported by evidence and raises several theoretical and experimental concerns. Further research and experimental evidence is needed to validate this approach.