Numbers in the appendix of Arthur C. Clarke's 1945 classic paper

In summary: This is a key principle in rocket design outlined by Clarke in his 1945 paper. In summary, the necessary R of 37 to 1 for an automatically controlled rocket to achieve a final velocity of 10 km/sec is a result of a high acceleration (5g) and a low specific impulse (3.3 km/sec). This principle is outlined in Arthur C. Clarke's 1945 paper on rocket design.
  • #1
MB2012
1
0

Homework Statement



This question relates to the numbers in the appendix of Arthur C. Clarke's 1945 classic paper (Wireless World, Oct. 1945, pp. 305-308).

The appendix (on page 308 of the paper) outlines some basic principles of rocket design, including Tsiolkovsky's fundamental equation of rocket motion which is given as:

V = v log_e (R)

where V is the final velocity of the rocket, v is the exhaust velocity, and R is the ratio of initial mass to final mass (payload plus structure).

Clarke states that: "If we assume v to be 3.3 km/sec. R will be 20 to 1." (For V = 10 km/sec.)

Clarke goes on to state that due to the rocket's finite acceleration, it loses velocity as a result of gravitational retardation and the necessary ratio R_g is increased to

R_g = R * ( (a + g) / (a) )

where a is the rocket's acceleration and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

Clarke goes on to say that (and this is where my problem is): "For an automatically controlled rocket a would be about 5g and so the necessary R would be 37 to 1."

How does the necessary R come to be 37 to 1?


Homework Equations



Tsiolkovsky's fundamental equation of rocket motion:

V = v log_e (R)

where V is the final velocity of the rocket, v is the exhaust velocity, and R is the ratio of initial mass to final mass (payload plus structure).

R_g = R * ( (a + g) / (a) )

where a is the rocket's acceleration and g is the acceleration due to gravity.



The Attempt at a Solution



V = v * log_e (R)

10 = 3.3 * log_e (R)

R = e^(10/3.3)

R = 20.7

QED (R is approximately 20 to 1)

R_g = R * ( (a + g) / (a) )

R_g = R * ( (5g + g) / (5g) )

R_g = R * (6g / 5g)

R_g = 1.2 * R

(EQUIVALENTLY: R = 0.83 * R_g)

How does R become 37 to 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


To determine how the necessary R comes to be 37 to 1, we need to first understand the concept of specific impulse. This is a measure of the efficiency of a rocket engine and is defined as the thrust produced by the engine divided by the rate of propellant consumption. In other words, it is a measure of how much thrust is produced per unit of propellant. In this case, the specific impulse is given by the exhaust velocity (v).

Using Tsiolkovsky's equation, we can see that for a given final velocity (V), the necessary R (ratio of initial mass to final mass) will increase as the exhaust velocity decreases. This is because a lower exhaust velocity means that more propellant is needed to achieve the same final velocity.

Now, in the case of an automatically controlled rocket, the acceleration (a) will be much higher than the acceleration due to gravity (g). This is because the rocket is designed to accelerate quickly and efficiently, so a higher acceleration is needed.

Using the equation for R_g, we can see that as the acceleration (a) increases, the necessary R also increases. This is because a higher acceleration means that the rocket will need more propellant to overcome the gravitational pull and maintain its velocity.

So, in the case of an automatically controlled rocket with an acceleration of 5g, the necessary R will be significantly higher than 20 to 1. In fact, using the equation R = 0.83 * R_g, we can see that R will be approximately 37 to 1. This means that for every 1 unit of initial mass, the rocket will need 37 units of final mass (payload plus structure) to achieve a final velocity of 10 km/sec.

In conclusion, the necessary R of 37 to 1 comes from the combination of a high acceleration (5g) and a relatively low specific impulse (3.3 km/sec), both of which are necessary for an automatically controlled rocket to reach a final velocity of 10 km/sec.
 

Related to Numbers in the appendix of Arthur C. Clarke's 1945 classic paper

What is the significance of the numbers in the appendix of Arthur C. Clarke's 1945 classic paper?

The numbers in the appendix of Arthur C. Clarke's 1945 classic paper represent calculations and predictions made by the author regarding the potential for geostationary satellites. These numbers laid the foundation for the development of modern communication and technology.

How accurate were the numbers in Clarke's 1945 paper?

At the time the paper was written, the numbers were considered highly accurate and groundbreaking. However, as technology and understanding of space has advanced, some of the numbers have been proven to be slightly off. Nonetheless, the overall predictions and concepts presented in the paper were revolutionary and continue to be relevant today.

What impact did the numbers in Clarke's paper have on the development of technology?

The numbers in Clarke's paper sparked a wave of innovation and research in the field of communication and space technology. They provided a theoretical framework for the development of geostationary satellites, which have become integral to modern communication systems such as GPS, television, and internet.

How did Clarke come up with the numbers in his paper?

Clarke used his knowledge of physics and mathematics to make calculations and predictions based on existing scientific theories and principles. He also drew inspiration from science fiction and his own imagination, envisioning a future where satellites could be used for global communication.

Are the numbers in Clarke's paper still relevant today?

Although some of the specific numbers may have been proven to be slightly inaccurate, the overall concepts and predictions presented in Clarke's paper remain relevant and influential. The development of geostationary satellites and their impact on communication and technology is a testament to the enduring significance of the numbers in Clarke's 1945 paper.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
303
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
669
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top