Specific relativity Length Contraction and Time dialation question

In summary: LY. But according to Earth observers, the distance is 2.2713 LY. So something has to give. In summary, the spaceship is travelling towards Earth at a speed of 0.82C and fires projectiles with a speed of 0.72C. Initially, the pilot measured his distance from the Earth to be 1.3 LY. However, based on the equation for length contraction, the contracted distance between the spaceship and Earth should be 2.2713 LY. However, this is not the case as 1.3 LY observed by the Earth is what is given.
  • #1
Galgenstrick
50
0
Special relativity Length Contraction and Time dilation question

Homework Statement



Planet X is 18 Light Years from earth, A spaceship moving towards the Earth at a speed of 0.82C (Measured from Planet X) fires a series of 1.2 cm long and 2.1 gram mass (as measured by the pilot) projectiles with a speed of 0.72C (Measured by the pilot) towards the earth. At the moment the projectiles were fired the pilot measured his distance from the Earth to be 1.3 light years.

a.) From the point of view of the observer on earth, how far away is the spaceship from Earth when it starts firing?

There are parts b-f, That I will add later if I get stuck on these as well.


Homework Equations



L'=L / [tex]\gamma[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I am having two difficulties. First, the speed of the spaceship is 0.82C as measured by Planet X, is this the velocity I need to answer the question? or do I need to find the velocity as it would be measured by the earth?

Second, Is there "negative velocity" in this equation? What I mean is, since the spaceship is traveling towards the earth, would the velocity be negative? Or is velocity always positive whether or not an object is moving towards or away from you?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Galgenstrick said:
First, the speed of the spaceship is 0.82C as measured by Planet X, is this the velocity I need to answer the question? or do I need to find the velocity as it would be measured by the earth?
Presumably, Planet X and the Earth are at rest with respect to each other. So they both measure the same speed for the spaceship.
Second, Is there "negative velocity" in this equation? What I mean is, since the spaceship is traveling towards the earth, would the velocity be negative? Or is velocity always positive whether or not an object is moving towards or away from you?
Does it matter? In the equation you need for this question, v enters into the expression for gamma as v^2.
 
  • #3
Doc Al said:
Presumably, Planet X and the Earth are at rest with respect to each other. So they both measure the same speed for the spaceship.

Does it matter? In the equation you need for this question, v enters into the expression for gamma as v^2.

You just saved the day, thank you so much!
 
  • #4
There is one other detail I missed. I was using 1.3 Light Years as the proper length, But I don't think this is correct. how can I calculate the proper length?
 
  • #5
If the 1.3 LY distance is the measured contracted length (in the ship's frame), what must be the proper length (in the Earth's frame)?
 
  • #6
Doc Al said:
If the 1.3 LY distance is the measured contracted length (in the ship's frame), what must be the proper length (in the Earth's frame)?

I came up with this, 1.3/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)... Since 1.3=L/gama, does that look correct?Edit: this doesn't seem to work, because it will give me 1.3 LY observed by the earth, which doesn't make sense.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Galgenstrick said:
I came up with this, 1.3/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)... Since 1.3=L/gama, does that look correct?
Looks OK.

Edit: this doesn't seem to work, because it will give me 1.3 LY observed by the earth, which doesn't make sense.
:confused: L = 1.3*gamma.
 
  • #8
Doc Al said:
Looks OK.:confused: L = 1.3*gamma.

My textbook gives me L'=L/gamma, or L=L(proper) / gamma

1.3/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is the same as 1.3*gamma
 
  • #9
Here is what I have so far, and why I think it is not correct:

Step 1:
Find the proper distance between ship and earth,

L=L(proper) / gamma, so 1.3 = L(proper) * sqrt(1-(0.82c)^2/c^2)

Solving for L(proper) = 2.2713 LY.

Step 2:
Find the contracted distance as observed by the earth.

L=L(proper) / gamma

L= 2.2713 * sqrt(1-(0.82c)^2/c^2)

L= 1.3 LY

So you see I just went in a circle. I found the proper length, then used the proper length and got the contracted length as observed by the pilot as my answer. Somewhere I am missing something.
 
  • #10
Galgenstrick said:
Here is what I have so far, and why I think it is not correct:

Step 1:
Find the proper distance between ship and earth,

L=L(proper) / gamma, so 1.3 = L(proper) * sqrt(1-(0.82c)^2/c^2)

Solving for L(proper) = 2.2713 LY.
In this context the proper distance is that measured in the Earth frame. You're done.

Step 2:
Find the contracted distance as observed by the earth.

L=L(proper) / gamma

L= 2.2713 * sqrt(1-(0.82c)^2/c^2)

L= 1.3 LY

So you see I just went in a circle. I found the proper length, then used the proper length and got the contracted length as observed by the pilot as my answer. Somewhere I am missing something.
Yes, you went in a circle. Imagine that there's a ruler stretching from Earth to planet X. That ruler measures 'proper' distance between those two, which is the distance according to Earth observers. At some point along that ruler, the spaceship starts firing projectiles. According to the spaceship, the distance is 1.3 LY from earth. The spaceship, which is moving, sees the contracted distance. To find the proper distance, just multiply by gamma.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
In this context the proper distance is that measured in the Earth frame. You're done.


Yes, you went in a circle. Imagine that there's a ruler stretching from Earth to planet X. That ruler measures 'proper' distance between those two, which is the distance according to Earth observers. At some point along that ruler, the spaceship starts firing projectiles. According to the spaceship, the distance is 1.3 LY from earth. The spaceship, which is moving, sees the contracted distance. To find the proper distance, just multiply by gamma.


AHH! I see now. Thank you again!
 
  • #12
Looks like I have one more question for the last part (part f) of this problem.

f.) Given that one of the projectiles misses the Earth. What is the mass of the projectile as observed from earth.

I am probably going to need the equation E=gamma*m*c^2. I know the mass of the projectile as measured from the pilot, however; I don't know the rest mass of the projectile to use this equation. I am not exactly sure where to start. I also know the speed of the projectile as observed (that was part b).
 
  • #13
Galgenstrick said:
f.) Given that one of the projectiles misses the Earth. What is the mass of the projectile as observed from earth.
I presume that they want the relativistic mass of the projectile.
I am probably going to need the equation E=gamma*m*c^2.
What's the definition of relativistic mass?
I know the mass of the projectile as measured from the pilot, however; I don't know the rest mass of the projectile to use this equation.
The mass given is the rest mass of the projectile.
I also know the speed of the projectile as observed (that was part b).
Good--you'll need that speed.
 
  • #14
I couldn't find anything in my textbook about relativistic mass, but here is what I found online: m = gamma * m0,

Also, Why is the mass observed by the pilot the rest mass if it is moving 0.82c?
 
  • #15
Galgenstrick said:
I couldn't find anything in my textbook about relativistic mass, but here is what I found online: m = gamma * m0,
That's what you need.
Also, Why is the mass observed by the pilot the rest mass if it is moving 0.82c?
When they give the mass of the projectile as 2.1 grams as measured by the pilot, presumably they mean before he fires them. So that's the rest mass of the projectiles.
 
  • #16
Doc Al said:
When they give the mass of the projectile as 2.1 grams as measured by the pilot, presumably they mean before he fires them. So that's the rest mass of the projectiles.

Right, but since the pilot is moving at 0.82c relative to the earth, so is the projectile before it is fired. So wouldn't I need the mass of the projectile as it would be if it were motionless on Earth?
 
  • #17
Galgenstrick said:
Right, but since the pilot is moving at 0.82c relative to the earth, so is the projectile before it is fired. So wouldn't I need the mass of the projectile as it would be if it were motionless on Earth?
The rest mass of the projectile will be the same in any frame in which it is at rest. When the pilot measured the mass of the projectiles, presumably they were at rest with respect to him. So 2.1 g is their rest mass.

To find their relativistic mass, you need to know how fast they are moving with respect to the observer.
 

Related to Specific relativity Length Contraction and Time dialation question

1. What is the concept of length contraction in special relativity?

The concept of length contraction in special relativity refers to the phenomenon where the length of an object appears shorter when it is moving at high speeds relative to an observer. This is due to the distortion of space and time at high speeds, as predicted by Einstein's theory of special relativity.

2. How does length contraction affect the measurements of objects?

Length contraction affects the measurements of objects by making them appear shorter in the direction of motion when measured by an observer in a different frame of reference. This means that the actual length of an object may be different for observers in different frames of reference, depending on their relative speeds.

3. What is time dilation in special relativity?

Time dilation in special relativity refers to the phenomenon where time appears to move slower for objects that are moving at high speeds relative to an observer. This is due to the distortion of time at high speeds, as predicted by Einstein's theory of special relativity.

4. How does time dilation affect the measurement of time for moving objects?

Time dilation affects the measurement of time for moving objects by making time appear to pass slower for them compared to stationary objects. This means that moving objects will experience time differently than stationary objects, and their clocks will run slower when observed by an outside observer.

5. What are some real-world applications of length contraction and time dilation?

Some real-world applications of length contraction and time dilation include GPS systems, where satellites in orbit experience time dilation due to their high speeds, and this must be accounted for in order to accurately calculate positions on Earth. Another example is particle accelerators, where particles are accelerated to near the speed of light, causing length contraction and time dilation effects to be observed.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
54
Views
1K
Replies
63
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
596
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
508
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top