UK Plutonium Problem: Fast Reactor or MOx Plant?

[koab1mjr]

I was curious to know the PF communities opinion on the recent press the UK has been generating in its choice on retrying a MOx plant or dabbling with a Fast Reactor Tech


How would you all vote if you were in charge?


I am for fast reactors since the industry needs the push but I am biased as a young person in the field.

 

[Thermalne]

I'd say they should go with the two pack of GEH Fast Reactors. Get rid of the plutonium and produce power while they're at it!

 

[Astronuc]

University of Manchester is to provide expert input to GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) in its promotion of the use of Prism fast reactors to dispose of the UK's plutonium stocks.
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/WR-University_to_support_Prism_promotion-3005124.html

http://www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/research/groups/nuclear/index.html

http://www.dalton.manchester.ac.uk/

 

[nikkkom]

I'd say they should go with the two pack of GEH Fast Reactors. Get rid of the plutonium and produce power while they're at it!

Why should we get rid of the plutonium (I assume weapon grade)? It was produced at horrendous expense. If we burn it now and then need it again (asteroid blasting?), we will need to make it again.

What's the problem with just storing it somewhere secure?

 

[alphy]

I understand the importance of considering all factors and making evidence-based decisions in such matters. In this case, the choice between a fast reactor or MOx plant should be based on a thorough analysis of various factors such as safety, cost, efficiency, and environmental impact.

While both options have their advantages and disadvantages, it is crucial to prioritize safety and minimize potential risks. Fast reactors have the potential to generate more energy and reduce the amount of plutonium waste, but they also come with safety concerns such as the risk of nuclear proliferation and accidents.

On the other hand, MOx plants may have a lower risk of proliferation and accidents, but they also have higher costs and produce more long-lived radioactive waste. Therefore, a careful evaluation of these factors is necessary to make an informed decision.

In my opinion, it is essential to invest in research and development to improve the safety and efficiency of fast reactors before implementing them on a larger scale. This will not only address safety concerns but also pave the way for a more sustainable and reliable energy source in the future.

Ultimately, the decision should be based on a holistic approach, considering all aspects and finding a balance between meeting energy demands and ensuring safety and sustainability. As for my vote, I would support further research and development in fast reactor technology while also exploring other alternative energy sources.