Van der Pol Oscillator limit cycle

In summary, the problem involves a Van der Pol oscillator with small epsilon, which has a circular limit cycle in a phase space trajectory. The equation of motion and Fourier-series for the limit cycle are given. The goal is to simplify the equation to a simpler form, which involves using trigonometric identities and solving for x.
  • #1
kornelthefirst
1
0
Homework Statement
We have a Van der Pol oscillator with small ##\epsilon## and after writing up a Fourier-series we have to bring it to a simpler form.
Relevant Equations
Equation of motion for the Van der Pol oscillator$$\ddot{x} + \epsilon(x^{2} - 1)\dot{x} + x = 0$$ Fourier-series for the limit cycle(already given) $$x_\epsilon^p(t) = \frac{a_0}{2} + \sum\limits_{k=1}^{\infty } [a_k \cos(k \omega t) + b_k \sin(k \omega t)]$$ Equation we need to arrive to$$\epsilon (x_p^2 - 1)\dot{x_p} = \epsilon a_1\omega[(1-\frac{a_1^2}{4})\sin(\omega t)-\frac{a_1^2}{4}\sin(3 \omega t)]$$
First i looked at the case of ## \epsilon = 0## and came to the conclusion, that this oscillator has a circular limit cycle in a phase space trajectory, when plotted with the axes x and ##\dot{x}##.
I have found that ##x_0^p (t) = a_1 \cos(t)## which implies that all other Fourier- coefficients have ##\epsilon## of at least power of 1
The limit cycle is independent of the starting conditions unless ##x = 0## and ##\dot{x} = 0##, so we can choose ##a_1## to be > 0 and ##b_1 > 0##.
If we put the equation of the Fourier-series back to the equation of motion we get$$\sum\limits_{k=1}^{\infty } [ - a_k \cos(k \omega t) - b_k sin( k \omega t)] + \epsilon (x^2-1)\dot{x} + \frac{a_0}{2}+\sum\limits_{k=1}^{\infty } [a_k \cos(k \omega t) + b_k sin( k \omega t)]$$ so simplified $$\epsilon (x^2-1)\dot{x} + \frac{a_0}{2} = 0$$ I am currently stuck here and can't find the next step. I can only assume it will include trigonometric identities, because i can see some patterns for some.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
kornelthefirst said:
Homework Statement: We have a Van der Pol oscillator with small ##\epsilon## and after writing up a Fourier-series we have to bring it to a simpler form.

I'm not sure this is the best approach to this problem; could you please post the exact problem statement?

Relevant Equations: Equation of motion for the Van der Pol oscillator$$\ddot{x} + \epsilon(x^{2} - 1)\dot{x} + x = 0$$ Fourier-series for the limit cycle(already given) $$x_\epsilon^p(t) = \frac{a_0}{2} + \sum\limits_{k=1}^{\infty } [a_k \cos(k \omega t) + b_k \sin(k \omega t)]$$ Equation we need to arrive to$$\epsilon (x_p^2 - 1)\dot{x_p} = \epsilon a_1\omega[(1-\frac{a_1^2}{4})\sin(\omega t)-\frac{a_1^2}{4}\sin(3 \omega t)]$$

First i looked at the case of ## \epsilon = 0## and came to the conclusion, that this oscillator has a circular limit cycle in a phase space trajectory, when plotted with the axes x and ##\dot{x}##.
I have found that ##x_0^p (t) = a_1 \cos(t)## which implies that all other Fourier- coefficients have ##\epsilon## of at least power of 1
The limit cycle is independent of the starting conditions unless ##x = 0## and ##\dot{x} = 0##, so we can choose ##a_1## to be > 0 and ##b_1 > 0##.
If we put the equation of the Fourier-series back to the equation of motion we get$$\sum\limits_{k=1}^{\infty } [ - a_k \cos(k \omega t) - b_k sin( k \omega t)] + \epsilon (x^2-1)\dot{x} + \frac{a_0}{2}+\sum\limits_{k=1}^{\infty } [a_k \cos(k \omega t) + b_k sin( k \omega t)]$$

You should have [tex]
\ddot x = -\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^2\omega^2 (a_n \cos (n\omega t) + b_n \sin (n\omega t)).[/tex]

I am currently stuck here and can't find the next step. I can only assume it will include trigonometric identities, because i can see some patterns for some.

I think the idea is that [itex]x(t) = a_1 \cos \omega t + \epsilon x_p(t)[/itex] so that [tex]\begin{split}
\ddot x + x &= -\epsilon(x^2 - 1)\dot x \\
(1 - \omega^2) \cos \omega t + \epsilon (\ddot x_p + x_p) &= \epsilon a_1 \omega (a_1^2 \cos^2\omega t - 1)\sin \omega t + O(\epsilon^2)\end{split}[/tex] subject to [itex]\dot x_p(0) = x_p(0) = 0[/itex]. We do not need a sine term in the leading order solution since that just amounts to a shift in the origin of time, which merely moves us to a different point on the limit cycle. It is not necessary to expand [itex]x_p[/itex] as a fourier series in order to solve this, although expressing the right hand side as a series in [itex]\sin n\omega t[/itex] and knowing [itex]\ddot y + y[/itex] where [itex]y = \sin n\omega t[/itex] or [itex]t\cos n\omega t[/itex] will assist.
 

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
979
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
869
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
275
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
973
Replies
1
Views
788
Back
Top