- #1
Simfish
Gold Member
- 823
- 2
So, I've just come across some of Tegmark's cosmology papers, and they're surprisingly readable.
It seems that most astronomy papers are quite readable, assuming that your background includes digital signal processing. In fact, they're far more readable than most of the old graduate school astro textbooks (which cover topics like radiation hydrodynamics or orbit potential theory). Somehow, these obscure topics aren't the hottest part of astro research today.
I'm pretty sure that general relativity is the hardest field. But are there any other fields whose papers are hard to read? I do have to improve my Bayesian statistics knowledge, of course, but the Bayesian statistics in most astro papers isn't that deep.
I'm curious, since I want to know how much farther I have to go.
It seems that most astronomy papers are quite readable, assuming that your background includes digital signal processing. In fact, they're far more readable than most of the old graduate school astro textbooks (which cover topics like radiation hydrodynamics or orbit potential theory). Somehow, these obscure topics aren't the hottest part of astro research today.
I'm pretty sure that general relativity is the hardest field. But are there any other fields whose papers are hard to read? I do have to improve my Bayesian statistics knowledge, of course, but the Bayesian statistics in most astro papers isn't that deep.
I'm curious, since I want to know how much farther I have to go.