Yet another spaceship moving at .9c thread

In summary, a spaceship moving at .9c would have a catastrophic impact if it hit a planet, with energy equivalent to about 4.7 petatons of TNT.
  • #1
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
10,303
1,474
Yet another "spaceship moving at .9c" thread

What I'd like to see a thread about is what would happen if a spaceship, moving at .9c, were to impact a planet. Let's say the spaceship was 100,000 metric tons, roughly the size of a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier.

It's not hard to figure out the energy of the spaceship, but it's harder to estimate the physical effects.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As a first approach, model the Earth and the ship as two particles.
Assuming a totally-inelastic collision, calculate the energy and momentum transferred.

Some facts via Google
"mass of Earth = 5.9742 × 10^24 kilograms"
and
"1 metric ton = 1 000 kilograms"
and
"1 / sqrt(1 - (.9^2)) = 2.29415734".
 
  • #3
I assume you mean the REST MASS of the spaceship.. As robphy pointed out, the "relativistic factor" at .9 c is only 2.29 so you are now talking "what if 2 and a quarter ships crashed into a planet. Doubt if it would do a whole lot!
 
  • #4
2.29 ships at .9C is still a lot of kinetic energy though...
 
  • #5
Wow. I'd like to know the answer to that question too. The kinetic energy of the ship is

[tex](\gamma-1)mc^2[/tex]

where m is the rest mass, and since gamma is roughly 2 in this case, the kinetic energy is close to the rest mass energy of the ship.

Since m=10^8 kg and c is roughly 3*10^8 m/s, this means that the kinetic energy is about 10^25 J.

That's a lot of Joules. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #6
2.29 ships at .9C is still a lot of kinetic energy though...

If a typical meteor hits the atmosphere at 30,000mph, an object of the same mass going .9c has 400 million times the kinetic energy. Thats considerably more energy than all the worlds' nuclear weapons put together. Anyone have a link to that impact calculator website (lemme see if I can find it...)?
 
  • #7
HERE it is. I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but it gives me a 10^9 megaton air-burst with a shock wave that at 1000 miles is 27 psi and flattens pretty much everything in its path.
 
  • #8
10^25 Joules is of order 10^9 megatons (according to onlineconversion.com), so it seems to be correct so far.
 
  • #9
Just to clarify, I mean the invariant mass of the ship, i.e. the rest mass, is 100,000 metric tons (this is about the same as the displacement mass of the Nimitz class carriers).

When I run the figures through the URL for the impact calculator, I use

(62 meter radius sphere of 100 kg/m^3 density -> 124 meter diameter, 100 kg/m^3 density)

and I get

Energy before atmospheric entry: NaN x 10NaN Joules = 8.68 x 10^8 MegaTons TNT

(which is .8 petatons, peta=10^15)

But I don't think that's right. I get 2*10^25 joules for the total energy of the ship. 2e25 joules is 4.7 petatons of TNT according to

online conversion

not .8 petatons.
 
  • #10
Dunno but its likely the impact equation is not using the correct relativistic laws, since its highly unnusual in practise anyway.

Either way, the point is that its a monumental explosion, that pretty much levels the Earth's surface and all life pretty damn fast. (Kinda puts some perspective on the alien crash claims) assuming say the size of an aircraft carrier.
 
  • #11
yeah relativistic velocities would not occur for something actually striking the earth.

Unless we really pissed off an alien race who then loaded a nimitz class carrier into a giant rail gun at shot it at us at .9c. So long as Bush is not president at first contact we should be ok...
 
  • #12
I rather laboriously computed the gravitational binding energy of a sphere of constant density of radius R, only to find the result with a websearch

here

It turns out that the gravitational binding energy of the Earth is 2.24*10^32 joules. The impact calculated earlier in the thread has 2*10^25 joules of KE, so it has about one ten-millionth of the binding energy of the Earth.

The binding energy of the Earth's atmosphere is 3*10^26 joules (by my calculation, -G Mearth Matmos / Rearth, with Matmos = 5*10^21 kg.) So the impact has about 1/15 of the gravitational binding energy of the atmosphere.
 

Related to Yet another spaceship moving at .9c thread

1. What is the meaning of "Yet another spaceship moving at .9c"?

This phrase refers to a hypothetical scenario in which a spaceship is traveling at 90% of the speed of light, also known as .9c. It is often used in discussions about the effects of traveling at high speeds on objects and time.

2. How is the speed of .9c achieved by a spaceship?

Achieving a speed of .9c is currently not possible with our current technology. It is a theoretical speed that is often used in scientific discussions as an example of traveling at extremely high speeds.

3. What are some of the effects of traveling at .9c?

Traveling at .9c would result in significant time dilation, meaning time would pass slower for the spaceship compared to an observer on Earth. This would also result in length contraction, where the spaceship would appear shorter to an outside observer. Additionally, the spaceship would experience a large increase in mass, making it more difficult to accelerate.

4. Can anything travel faster than .9c?

According to our current understanding of physics, it is not possible for anything to travel faster than the speed of light, which is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. Therefore, it is not possible for a spaceship or any other object to travel at .9c or faster.

5. How does the speed of .9c relate to the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein, states that the laws of physics are the same for all non-accelerating observers and that the speed of light is constant regardless of the observer's frame of reference. The concept of traveling at .9c is often used in discussions about the theory of relativity, as it highlights some of the effects predicted by the theory such as time dilation and length contraction.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
849
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top