- #1
Dropout
- 53
- 0
The old 2D paper describing 3D curvature is a little lame because it uses gravity to describe gravity. You know, the little ball circling the 2D psuedo-black hole, well remove gravity and the ball would fly off the 2D paper, you can't use gravity to describe gravity. It would be like saying 1=1 because 1=1. Proving your answer with the question.
How else can you visualize shortened distances, even in 2D. Has anyone else been bothered by that before?
How else can you visualize shortened distances, even in 2D. Has anyone else been bothered by that before?