Prove that range ##T'## = ##(\text{null}\ T)^0##

  • #1
zenterix
541
75
Homework Statement
Prove the following theorem (Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, Theorem 3.109)

Suppose ##V## and ##W## are finite-dimensional and ##T\in L(V,W)##. Then

(a) ##\text{dim range}\ T' = \text{dim range}\ T##

(b) ##\text{range}\ T'=(\text{null}\ T)^0##
Relevant Equations
(a)

##\text{dim null}\ T' = \text{dim null}\ T + \text{dim}\ W-\text{dim}\ V\tag{1}##

##=\text{dim} W'-\text{dim range}\ T'\tag{2}##

##=\text{dim}\ W-\text{dim range}\ T'\tag{3}##

From (1) and (3) we have

##\text{dim range}\ T'=\text{dim}\ V-\text{dim null}\ T=\text{dim range}\ T\tag{4}##
My question is about item (b).

(b)

Here is what I drew up to try to visualize the result to be proved

1698618821100.png


The general idea, I think, is that

1) ##(\text{null}\ T)^0## and ##\text{range}\ T'## are both subspaces of ##V'=L(V,\mathbb{F})##.

2) We can show that they have the same dimension.

3)We can show that ##\text{range}\ T' \subseteq (\text{null}\ T)^0##

4) From (2) and (3) we can prove that the two subspaces are in fact the same subspace.

Honestly, I did steps (1)-(3) myself and was looking for a way to infer (4) but didn't realize that I could use (2) and (3) to do so, so I looked at the proof in the book.

I'd like to know if there is another way to infer (4).

Here is what I have

##(\text{null}\ T)^0## is by definition all the linear functionals in ##V'## that map ##\text{null}\ T## to 0 in ##\mathbb{F}##.

For every ##\varphi\in W'##, the linear functional ##\varphi\circ T## maps ##\text{null}\ T## to 0 in ##\mathbb{F}##, so ##\varphi\circ T## is in ##(\text{null}\ T)^0##.

Now, at this point, it could be that there are other elements in ##(\text{null}\ T)^0## that are not one of the ##\varphi\circ T##.

How can I prove that this is not possible (in an alternative manner to (4))?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think I found the answer to my question. It uses the dimensions as well.

Let's use a proof by contradiction.

Suppose there were an ##\alpha\in (\text{null }\ T)^0## that is not in ##\text{range}\ T'##.

From (a) we know that range ##T'## and range ##T## have the same dimension and so are isomorphic.

In addition, we have dim ##V## = dim null ##T## + dim range ##T##.

However, the dimension of the complement of null ##T## in ##V## also has dimension dim range ##T##.

Thus this complement is isomorphic with range ##T##.

Let ##v_1,...,v_n## be a basis for this complement subspace. ##\alpha\in(\text{null}\ T)^0## maps these to the scalars ##f_1, ..., f_n## in ##\mathbb{F}##.

##T## maps ##v_1,...,v_n## to ##w_1, ...,w_n## in range ##T##.

Let's define a ##\varphi\in W'## by ##\varphi(w_i)=f_i## for ##i=1,...,n##.

Then, ##\varphi\circ T## maps ##v_1,...,v_n## to ##f_1,...,f_n## and so ##\varphi\circ T=\alpha##.

Thus, ##\alpha\in \text{range}\ T'##, contradicting our initial assumption.

We can then infer, by proof by contradiction, that all vectors in ##(\text{null }\ T)^0## are in range ##T'##.

And since we have proved that range ##T'\subseteq (\text{null}\ T)^0## we can conclude that

$$\text{range}\ T'=(\text{null}\ T)^0$$
 

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
718
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
489
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
698
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
969
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
385
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
597
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
913
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
615
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top