Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?

  • #1
SaschaSIGI
3
0
I am thinking why the following holds: Let f be a smooth function with f: Ω⊂R^m→R. Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?
Would be helpful if you are providing me some guidance or tips:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That set is the locus of function ##f##, and is a subset of ##\Omega\times \mathbb R##, which in turn is a subset of ##\mathbb R^{m+1}##.
By analogy with the locii of function from ##\mathbb R\to\mathbb R## ( a line, ie one-dimensional manifold in a 2D space), and from ##\mathbb R^2\to \mathbb R## (a surface or 2D manifold in a 3D space), we'd expect the set to be a ##m##-dimensional manifold.

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to, for any arbitrary point in the set, construct a homeomorphism from an open neighbourhood of the point to an open subset of ##\mathbb R^m##. If you can do that, you've proven the set is a ##m##-dimensional manifold.

Construction of that homeomorphism may involve the function ##f## in some way, or at least use its property of smoothness.

EDIT: Just realised the proposition is not true unless we require ##\Omega## to be a manifold. Consider where ##\Omega = \{0\} \cup [1,2]## and ##f(x)=x##. Then neither the domain nor the locus of ##f## is a manifold. They are each the union of a 0-dimensional manifold with a 1-dimensional manifold with boundary.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #3
SaschaSIGI said:
I am thinking why the following holds: Let f be a smooth function with f: Ω⊂R^m→R. Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?
Would be helpful if you are providing me some guidance or tips:)
The open set ##\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^m## with the standard coordinates is a coordinate patch in this graph, so the graph is a manifold
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #4
Proving this in the one dimensional case first is probably instructive if you're still lost.
 
  • #5
Basic principle: a graph is isomorphic to its domain. i.e. map x in the domain to (x,f(x)), and map back the point (x,f(x)) to x, via projection onto the "x axis".

remember this, it is very useful.
 
  • #6
IIRC, there are results regarding the Jacobian being nonzero.
 
  • #7
wrobel said:
The open set ##\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^m## with the standard coordinates is a coordinate patch in this graph, so the graph is a manifold
Why do you assume ##\Omega## is open?
 

Similar threads

  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
807
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
131
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
892
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top