Dr. Kaku's omission of Tycho Crater and nanobots

  • Thread starter Rick Sobie
  • Start date
In summary, Dr. Michio Kaku, a renowned theoretical physicist, has made several intriguing predictions for the future, including the potential use of nanobots in medicine. However, in his predictions, he has omitted the significance of Tycho Crater, a large impact crater on the moon. This omission highlights the uncertainty and constantly evolving nature of scientific predictions, as well as the immense possibilities and discoveries that still await us in the future.
  • #1
Rick Sobie
19
0
Given that Tycho crater is perhaps the best evidence of alien presence I was wondering
why Dr. Kaku has yet to mention it on his numerous appearances on Art Bell
and etc?


Examine this link from the Naval Space Command website, and notice the
rectangular anomalies and the parallel lines crossing Tycho crater
independant of the topology of the crater, and notice also that
the floor of the crater is made up of regular polygons.
http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/clem_collect/tycho.html

Notice also, that the Navy mentions the anomalous polygon structure of the crater floor.

Also notice that the polygons show up better under infrared leading us to believe
that these polygons are giving off heat.


Notice also, that the center of Tycho Crater contains a tunnel leading to a
underground area. And the tunnel is surrounded by what can only be
a manufacturing process using perhaps nanobot technology.

http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/select_img/hires.html

Again if you examine the area from the viewpoint of the first link above,
you will see that the area is rectangular in shape, hundreds of miles across
and hundreds of miles wide, the polygons reflecting the engineered
roof of this underground structure.

Cearly this would seem to prove the theory, that the moon itself,
is a battle planet, and the carters not asteroid impacts,
but rather direct hits, when the shields were down.


So why haven't we sent in robotic probes, and more importantly,
why hasn't Dr. Kaku, mentioned the Tycho crater anomalies
when he has spoken of the need to return to the moon?

If you recall Arthur C. Clark mentioned Tycho crater as the location of the
Von Neuman probe and Dr. Kaku has also mentioned the probe.

So Dr. Kaku are you under duress? Do you have an alien implant
which is preventing you from discussing this in public?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Because Mr. Kaku is thinking too much in the things of his interest. You mentioned Arthur Clark who provided the idea for the film Space Odysee 2001. Yet Clark was Carl Sagan friend and knew A BUNCH OF OTHER THINGS KAKU IGNORES. Or he knows but don't want to be in the middle of a controversy. Sagan sent a message to eventual aliens in Pioneer 10. Yet the idea was shared by Richard Hoagland who has given lectures in Nasa and was the youngest guy in all USA who was a curator in Space museum besides winning the Angstrom Medal for Excellence in Science (something our Moderator probably won't ever achieve), he was former space program consultant to Walter Cronkite and CBS news, former planetarium director, heads independent non-profit organization, the Enterprise Mission which is actually showing to the world the things NASA purposely hides, specially about geologic anomalies on Mars surface. I know this cos I have read and saw Nasa photographs and information literally CUT OFF or their photographs without zoom. How many people know the photographs used are usually infrared which give an unnatural red color to Martian surface or Nasa's procedure to "martianize the sky", etc. If Kaku were a bit smarter, he should not only arrive to similar conclusions but would call atention to those Martian facts he ignores. Alien doesn't have to be seek outside but even in hyperdimensions right here on Earth. The film Mission Mars was done because the work of Hoagland and others in case the readers ignore that. But I suppose Mr. Moderator doesn't want ME to write about those "theories" right? I must write about math contradictory conclusions but I can't talk about the book written by a scientific leader, Monuments on Mars. He didn't say a single word against you cos you quoted Arthur Clark, but if I mention Hoagland who won medal in his achievments on science, I would be consider "cursed" and will deserve a "warning" before they kick me out.
 
  • #4
You mention nanotechnology, what if I show the photograph of nanotechnology somewhere else?
Go to:
http:paranormal.about.com/cs/ancientanomalies/index_4.htm
Go to "Sensational Find in Russia". Of course, Dr. Kaku maybe doesn't even have the slightest clue about this.
 
  • #5
But I don't want to talk about methane on Mars...ha-ha!
 
  • #6
[QUOTING : Rick Sobie]

Given that Tycho crater is perhaps the best evidence of alien presence I was wondering why Dr. Kaku has yet to mention it on his numerous appearances on Art Bell and etc?

Notice also, that the center of Tycho Crater contains a tunnel leading to a
underground area. And the tunnel is surrounded by what can only be
a manufacturing process using perhaps nanobot technology.
_________________________________________________________________

You stated that the Tycho crater is perhaps the best evidence..
keyword here is "perhaps"

Also, you state that there is a tunnel (which I can assume by looking at the photograph) - Also, you used the word "perhaps" once again.

\Per*haps"\, adv. [Per + hap chance.] By chance; peradventure; perchance; it may be.

So why bash the credibility of Dr. Kaku by using assumptions of your own that cannot be proven. You should however contact the Naval Space Command about your assumptions of the moon having sheilds. Just send a self-addressed stamped envelope to: Naval Research Laboratory, Code 5590, 4555 Overlook Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20375

Cheers'
 
  • #7
Yeh? Well you can also write to Enterprise Mission. P.O.Box 52017, Albuquerque, NM, 87181 or fax asking for specific information from NASA itself to the number (505) 3321164 about whatever evidence you need.
www.enterprisemission.com/soho.htm
www.enterprisemission.com/images/Spirit/BONNEV1.jpg
www.enterprisemission.com/sphinx2.htm
www.enterprisemission.com/Path-sphinx.htm[/URL]
If you're skeptical enough to believe those photos are hoaxes or games you can still buy the "official" book by National Geographic and commentary by Matt Golombek from Pathfinder in the book UNCOVERING THE SECRETS OF THE RED PLANET. You can even put the 3D lens accompanying the book and compare that is the same image appearing in the page 146 , the complete sphinx in front of mountain with pyramid shape (but of course NASA didn't want you to see a photo with ZOOM) and then you can check how in the page 210 the NASA cut off the photograph hiding the pyramids tetrahedrons near the "face". In the following page you'll see they set the BLURRED black and white worst photograph among at least 11 available while they set the large photo of the so called "eroded" mountain without other photographs available including infrared, etc.
[PLAIN]www.planetarymysteries.com/mars/NASA2f.html[/URL]
[url]www.enterprisemission.com/images/mtm10.JPG[/url]
[PLAIN]www.planetarymysteries.com/mars/images/cityf.jpg[/URL]
[url]www.bob-wonderland.supanet.com/face_4.htm[/url]
[PLAIN]www.eaglesdisobey.com/glasstube1.htm
www.mufor.org/cydonia.htm
www.aadm.com/cydonia/Cydonia2.htm[/URL]
[PLAIN]www.think-aboutit.com/Mars/island_city.htm[/URL]
[PLAIN]www.mactonnies.com/imperative21.html[/URL]
[PLAIN]http://www.xtl-ak.com/marstrees.html
www.enterprisemission.com/catbox.htm
www.projectredstar.com/index.php
www.insight.com/IIM/tubeanimation.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
Geez. Face on Mars, Illuminati, and I don't know what all. This thread goes to the Skepticism forum.
 
  • #9
Well you can go wherever you want and sent me if you want. That's why I say to INTELLIGENT people to check PHOTOGRAPHS of people who have given conferences at Nasa like winner of EXCELLENCE ON SCIENCE (something you'll never get), Richard Hoagland. In fact I said more, in case your OLD NEURONS didn' t get it, I say it again. You can check the photos for NASA even with the official book. You will continue to be as stupid as a deaf & dumb wall. Let it be. Something else to add? Of course not, it figures you had to write something against me.
 
  • #10
By the way, one thing is Illuminati and other thing is Freemasonry. Perhaps your are not aware Newton, Benjamin Franklin and other famous people from your country were Freemasons. WRONG AGAIN,********!


Edit by Ivan: Profanity and personal attacks are not allowed at this forum. This goes for the skeptics and everyone else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
And once again, you ERASE the information about how many people is reading, etc. Complete ******* deceiving yourself!

Edit by Ivan.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Meantime:
www.enterprisemission.com/paper_1/paper/paper_1.php?page=paper1[/URL]
[url]www.enterprisemission.com/mola.htm[/url]
Once again, Mr.Moderator sends to hell the work of men of science, including geologists and experts in computer and photograph. Please, give us Michio Kaku's e-mail in order to send information for him, he's the scientist, you're just an imbecil who happens to be "moderator". Nobody knows your name, in fact you are known by a nickname. Who cares about you think is relevant or irrelevant. Tell Dr. Kaku, his search of hypothetical Illuminati entities type I, II or III is over. Tell him to find evidence at Nasa, real evidence of people who are scientists and not just hoax videotapes made in home (as it is generally assumed happening in 100% of the cases, which is insolent doubt).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
I'm curious, has "Mr Moderator" as oscar so eloquently calls him ever removed a post simply because it was not scientifically accurate or differed from his own opinions? Has any moderator?
 
  • #14
I apologise for my comments about dr. kaku, but I find it hard to take anybody seriously who can see a large cats face in the images, admittedly it does look like a lions face if you place a mirror down the middle.
 
  • #15
Well, they call it "catbox" and in fact "admittedly" you reckon there's a lion face if you place a mirror down the middle. Cats are related to lions, "username". That's exactly the point, if you mirror the other side of the eroded mountain and keep on searching you fill find this is not erosion at all but hidden zoo-anthropomorphous cryptographic message. The images appear cos the effect of shadows and light as it happens in places on Earth, the same civilizations who gave importance to solstices, equinoxes, eclipses and so on. The assymetry or symmetry was investigated by experts and not mere amateurs. They used special cameras and investigated the effect of light creating shadows in every possible direction. Now you can accept or deny the images, that's another thing...
 
  • #16
edit: removed annoying comment
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Now username, I just got after Oscar for making personal comments.
 

FAQ: Dr. Kaku's omission of Tycho Crater and nanobots

What is Dr. Kaku's reasoning for omitting Tycho Crater in his research?

Dr. Kaku may have omitted Tycho Crater in his research because it is a well-studied and well-known impact crater on the moon. As a scientist, he may have chosen to focus on lesser-known or more intriguing aspects of the moon's surface.

What are nanobots and how do they relate to Dr. Kaku's research?

Nanobots, also known as nanorobots, are tiny machines or robots that are designed to perform specific tasks at a microscopic level. In Dr. Kaku's research, he may have mentioned nanobots as a potential technology that could be used in future lunar exploration or colonization.

Why is Tycho Crater significant and why is its omission noteworthy?

Tycho Crater is a significant feature on the moon because it is one of the youngest and most well-preserved impact craters. Its omission in Dr. Kaku's research may be noteworthy because it is a prominent feature and has been the subject of numerous scientific studies and observations.

Is Dr. Kaku's research on the moon comprehensive without including Tycho Crater?

It is difficult to say whether Dr. Kaku's research on the moon is comprehensive without including Tycho Crater. While the crater may hold valuable information and insights, it may not be essential to the overall findings and conclusions of his research.

How does Dr. Kaku's research on the moon and nanobots impact our understanding of space exploration?

Dr. Kaku's research on the moon and nanobots may impact our understanding of space exploration by introducing new possibilities and technologies that could aid in future missions. It may also spark further research and discussions on the potential uses of nanobots in space exploration and colonization.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
9K
Back
Top