A Little Problem with a Simple Integral

  • Thread starter Alamino
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integral
In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of the integral I given a function P(x). The use of the step function \theta and the integral representation are mentioned, followed by a discussion of the calculation using residues. The issue of whether or not the integrated function can be considered as [tex]e^{-|k|^2/2}[\tex] is raised, with the conclusion that it cannot be done due to the difference between |k|^2 and k^2 for complex numbers.
  • #1
Alamino
71
0
If we have

[tex]P(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{1}{2} x^2},[/tex]

then

[tex]I=\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dx \, P(x) \theta(x)
= \int^{+\infty}_0 dx \, P(x)=\frac{1}{2},[/tex]

where [tex]\theta[/tex] is the step function. Now, using its integral representation, we have

[tex]
I=\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dx \, P(x) \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} \frac{dk}{k} \, e^{ikx} = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} \frac{dk}{k} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dx \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{1}{2}x^2+ikx}= \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} \frac{dk}{k} e^{-\frac{1}{2} k^2} .
[/tex]

But the integral over [tex]k[/tex] is calculated using residues and gives [tex]2\pi i[/tex] times the residue at [tex]k=0[/tex], what gives simply [tex]2\pi i[/tex] for the integral over [tex]k[/tex] and the wrong result 1 for the integral [tex]I[/tex]. I cannot see the catching. What is wrong with this calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Could you explain how you got from the second to last to the last expression? Also, I don't think you can close that last integral, because k is squared. So it will only go to 0 as R goes to infinity if -(x^2-y^2)<0, or |x|>|y|, where k=x+iy, and this is not true over the entire contour.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
The passage you're referring to is a gaussian integration. I'm not so sure (maybe all the problem is here), but I think that I can consider the integrated function as [tex]e^{-|k|^2/2}[\tex], what gives k squared for the reals and has not the problem you mentioned.
 
  • #4
I don't think you can do that. |k|^2 does not equal k^2 for complex numbers. In particular, the first is real while the second isn't.
 

FAQ: A Little Problem with a Simple Integral

What is a simple integral?

A simple integral is a mathematical calculation that represents the area under a curve in a particular interval. It is used to solve various real-world problems and is an essential concept in calculus.

Why is "A Little Problem with a Simple Integral" frequently discussed?

"A Little Problem with a Simple Integral" is a commonly discussed topic because it presents a challenge in solving a seemingly easy integral problem. It requires a deeper understanding of integration techniques and critical thinking skills to come up with the correct solution.

What makes "A Little Problem with a Simple Integral" difficult to solve?

The difficulty in solving "A Little Problem with a Simple Integral" lies in the fact that it involves multiple integration techniques, such as u-substitution and integration by parts. It also requires careful consideration of the limits of integration and the application of integration rules.

How can I approach solving "A Little Problem with a Simple Integral"?

To solve "A Little Problem with a Simple Integral," it is essential to break down the integral into simpler parts and apply the appropriate integration techniques. It would also help to have a good understanding of the properties of integrals and practice solving similar problems.

How can understanding "A Little Problem with a Simple Integral" benefit me as a scientist?

As a scientist, understanding "A Little Problem with a Simple Integral" can help you solve various real-world problems that involve calculating areas and volumes. It is also a fundamental concept in physics, engineering, and other fields of science that use calculus extensively.

Similar threads

Back
Top