A pulley system with two objects stacked on each other

In summary, the problem statement is incomplete and does not provide enough information to determine the mass of block C. Additional information, such as the acceleration of the blocks or the maximum mass for which block B does not slip, would be needed to solve the problem.
  • #1
Ace.
52
0

Homework Statement



Block B, with mass 5.00kg, rests on block A, with mass 8.00kg , which in turn is on a horizontal tabletop. There is no friction between block A and the tabletop, but the coefficient of static friction between block A and block B is 0.750. A light string attached to block A passes over a frictionless, massless pulley, and block C is suspended from the other end of the string. What is mass of block C?

Homework Equations


F=ma
FFriction = μmg

The Attempt at a Solution


I made equations for all 3 masses:

box C:
mCa=mcg-T. box B:
mBa=FSbox A:
mAa=T-FSadded all three equations, the internal forces (tension and friction) cancel and I get:

mCg = a(mA+mB+mC)

However I still have 2 unknowns ([itex]a[/itex] and mc)
I attempted to figure out acceleration using the equation for box B:

mBa=FS
mBa=μmBg
a = μg
a = (0.750)(9.8)
a = 7.35 m/s^2
but that seems to be a sketchy way to do it?
 

Attachments

  • blocks.JPG
    blocks.JPG
    6.9 KB · Views: 2,202
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As written, the problem statement is incomplete. Without knowing how the system is moving, there is no way to determine the mass of C (as evidenced by the fact that you have 3 equations and 4 unknowns - T, FS, a, mC).

The last part of your solution is incorrect because FS will depend on the acceleration of the blocks, which is unknown.
 
  • #3
swordthrower said:
As written, the problem statement is incomplete. Without knowing how the system is moving, there is no way to determine the mass of C (as evidenced by the fact that you have 3 equations and 4 unknowns - T, FS, a, mC).

The last part of your solution is incorrect because FS will depend on the acceleration of the blocks, which is unknown.

no when you add the 3 equations together you only have 2 unknowns. Then if you find the acceleration (7.35) and solve for mC you get 39 kg, which seems to be the correct answer.
 
  • #4
Ace. said:
FFriction = μmg
You seem to be making an implicit assumption here. The friction force is at most ##\mu mg## but it can be less. For example, if mass ##C## was zero and there was no movement, then the friction force would be zero.
 
  • #5
Ace. said:
no when you add the 3 equations together you only have 2 unknowns. Then if you find the acceleration (7.35) and solve for mC you get 39 kg, which seems to be the correct answer.
To get that acceleration, you had to assume that the frictional force between A and B was at its maximum value. This is presumably the missing piece of information.
The question as stated does not provide any basis for such an assumption. If the normal force is N and the coefficient of friction is μ then the frictional force is anything from -μN to +μN.
 
  • #6
Ace. said:
no when you add the 3 equations together you only have 2 unknowns. Then if you find the acceleration (7.35) and solve for mC you get 39 kg, which seems to be the correct answer.

You have a set of 3 equations and 4 unknowns. Adding them together is a good way to isolate the variables you want, but you still are under-constrained.

Regardless, the problem is incomplete and there needs to be another piece of information (most likely about the acceleration of the blocks) to determine the mass of block C.
 
  • #7
swordthrower said:
Regardless, the problem is incomplete and there needs to be another piece of information (most likely about the acceleration of the blocks) to determine the mass of block C.
No, most likely that it is the maximum mass for which the system remains static.
 
  • #8
haruspex said:
No, most likely that it is the maximum mass for which the system remains static.

Because the horizontal surface is frictionless, there is no static configuration for this system. The acceleration is mCg/(mA+mB+mC), which can only be zero if mC is zero or mA+mB is infinite.
 
  • #9
swordthrower said:
Because the horizontal surface is frictionless, there is no static configuration for this system. The acceleration is mCg/(mA+mB+mC), which can only be zero if mC is zero or mA+mB is infinite.
Sorry, I should have said, for which the blocks do not slide on each other.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Sorry, I should have said, for which the blocks do not slide on each other.

Gotcha. So you're assuming that the question is asking for the maximum mass of block C such that block B doesn't slip. That would make sense.

Who knew physics question forensics would be so much fun?!
 

FAQ: A pulley system with two objects stacked on each other

How does a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other work?

In a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other, one end of the rope is attached to the top object while the other end is attached to the bottom object. When you pull on the rope, the force is transmitted through the rope and the pulley, causing the top object to lift the bottom object.

What is the advantage of using a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other?

The advantage of using a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other is that it reduces the amount of force needed to lift the objects. With a pulley, you can distribute the weight of the objects between the two ends of the rope, making it easier to lift them.

What is the mechanical advantage of a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other?

The mechanical advantage of a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other depends on the number of ropes and pulleys involved. Generally, the more ropes and pulleys, the greater the mechanical advantage. For example, a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other and two pulleys has a mechanical advantage of 2, meaning the force needed to lift the objects is half the weight of the objects.

Are there any disadvantages to using a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other?

One potential disadvantage is that the pulley system may introduce some friction, which can decrease its efficiency. Also, the more ropes and pulleys involved, the more complex and potentially confusing the system may become.

How can a pulley system with two objects stacked on each other be used in real-life applications?

A pulley system with two objects stacked on each other can be used in various applications, such as lifting heavy objects in construction or moving objects in a factory. It can also be used in everyday tasks, such as raising a flag on a flagpole or pulling up a bucket from a well.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Back
Top