- #1
Austin0
- 1,160
- 1
Hi This is regarding the pinhole camera concept regarding apparent angular size.
If we take the simultaneity train and assume the lightning strikes are behind translucent ends of the observers car and that the observer has two pinhole cameras facing forward and back: In the view of the track observer the forward camera has moved toward the front of the car during the lights transit, and therefore the end appears bigger , subtends a larger angle.
Looking into the camera it is seen that as the light moves from the pinhole to the back, the film plane has moved forward, thus producing a smaller image. equivalent to moving a darkroom projector closer to the film plane.
Of course the exact opposite effect takes place with regard to the rear.
So in both directions this is logically consistent wrt the angular size.
But what about luminosity?? Photons per unit area?
The forward camera already has a larger area and less falloff that is intering the camera. Then the effect of the forward motion would concentrate that even more , just like moving a projector closer to the film plane.
And of course the effect would be exactly opposite toward the rear , where the motion away from the pinhole would tend to diffuse the image even more.
Yet I have to assume that this wound not actually take place but cannot figure out a mechanism that would prevent it from occurring . Any ideas? Something obvious I am missing equivalent to doppler self cancellation??.
Thanks
If we take the simultaneity train and assume the lightning strikes are behind translucent ends of the observers car and that the observer has two pinhole cameras facing forward and back: In the view of the track observer the forward camera has moved toward the front of the car during the lights transit, and therefore the end appears bigger , subtends a larger angle.
Looking into the camera it is seen that as the light moves from the pinhole to the back, the film plane has moved forward, thus producing a smaller image. equivalent to moving a darkroom projector closer to the film plane.
Of course the exact opposite effect takes place with regard to the rear.
So in both directions this is logically consistent wrt the angular size.
But what about luminosity?? Photons per unit area?
The forward camera already has a larger area and less falloff that is intering the camera. Then the effect of the forward motion would concentrate that even more , just like moving a projector closer to the film plane.
And of course the effect would be exactly opposite toward the rear , where the motion away from the pinhole would tend to diffuse the image even more.
Yet I have to assume that this wound not actually take place but cannot figure out a mechanism that would prevent it from occurring . Any ideas? Something obvious I am missing equivalent to doppler self cancellation??.
Thanks