Approximation methods that can be applied

In summary, there are several techniques that can be used to find integrals such as \int_{a}^{b} \left( x^2 + 1 \right)^2 \ dx and \int_{a}^{b} \left( x^2 + 1 \right)^{40} \ dx. These include approximation methods and substitution methods, with the latter possibly leading to a series solution. For non-elementary functions, such as \int e^{x^2} dx, a series form can be used to obtain the anti-derivative. Another example is \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx, which can be solved using a double integration step and a
  • #1
hedlund
34
0
How do I find integrals like
[tex] \int_{a}^{b} \left( x^2 + 1 \right)^2 \ dx [/tex]. This one is easy, since I can just turn it into [tex] \int_{a}^{b} \left( x^4 + 2x^2 + 1 \right) \ dx [/tex]. But what if it would say [tex] \int_{a}^{b} \left( x^2 + 1 \right)^{40} \ dx [/tex]? What technique should I use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are certain approximation methods that can be applied.
 
  • #3
Or substituion methods to obtain a (possibly hyperbolic) trig integral. Often you'll end up with trying to integrate something that we can write as:

I(n) = int f(x)dx

where f( x) is some function of x, and the n indicates some exponent or coefficient (the 40 in your case), then doing something like integration by parts you'll end up with

I(n-1) + something= I(n)

and you get an iteration going that let's you figure out how to solve the integral.
 
  • #4
I think you need to fix that latex.
 
  • #5
Yeah, I tried to (and then I deleted my post before I noticed that you had replied to it. Doh). LaTeX doesn't seem to like the combination of an integral sign, sum sign and a binomial coefficient... Let's try again:

[tex]\int (x^2 + 1)^{40} dx = \int \sum^{40}_{k=0} C^{40}_{k} x^{2k} dx = \left( \sum^{40}_{k=0} \frac{C^{40}_{k}}{2k + 1} x^{2k + 1} \right) + D.[/tex]

Actually calculating those binomial coefficients is going to suck though :P
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Leaving it as a series solution is absolutely fine--- consider

[tex]\int e^{x^2} dx[/tex]

There is no substitution you can use, but you can use the general series form of e^x and plug in x^2 and then integrate the sum as a whole, and leave you answer as that.
 
  • #7
this maybe silly, but wouldn't a trig sub then a integral table work for something like that?
 
  • #8
try the trig substitution for the original problem, let
[tex] x = \tan(y) [/tex], then the portion in the parentheses becomes [tex] \sec(y)^2 [/tex] from there you can make the substitutions and complete the integral. As for the [tex] e^{x^{2}} [/tex] over a finite interval, you have to use an integral table because it can only be done numerically, if the limits are infinite in extent, then the integral is [tex] \frac{\pi}{2} [/tex],
 
  • #9
[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx = \frac{\sqrt \pi}{2}[/tex]
 
  • #10
Yes, but the theelectricchild's point was that there is no "elementary" anti-derivative for \[e^{x^2}\]. The sad fact is that the great majority (in a very specific sense, "almost all") of nice "elementary" functions, even though they have an anti-derivative, the anti-derivative is not an "elementary" function.
 
  • #12
Hehe its ok, that's one of the first places I have seen a "squareroot" of pi... its an integral you can actually solve using a double integration step.

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx[/tex]

Convert to DI problem:

[tex]{(\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx)}^2[/tex]

[tex]=(\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx) (\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-y^2} dy)[/tex]

[tex]=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2}e^{-y^2} dxdy[/tex]

[tex]=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-{(x^2+y^2)}} dxdy[/tex]

From here using a Change of Variables step or noticing the region we are integrating is simply a semicircular arc, we can use polar coordinates:

[tex]=\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\int_{0}^{R} e^{-r^2}r drd\theta[/tex]

Where we take the limit of this as R --> infinity and the extra r in the integrand is from the Jacobian when switching to polar coordinates (proven in the change of variables theorem)

And NOW we can use a U-substitution to easily solve this iterated double integral:

[tex]{(\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx)}^2 = \frac{\pi}{4}[/tex]

So [tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx = \frac{\sqrt \pi}{2}[/tex]

It seems like we can solve quite a few "definite" or "improper" integrals of non elementary functions using multivar. calculus. Does anyone know any other methods? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I like integrating things.
 
  • #14
Where did the R come from again?
 
  • #15
Well taking an improper integral requires you to take the limit of the evaluated integral as some letter in place of infinity goes to it--- I didnt learn to do limits in TeX yet Ill show it later.
 

FAQ: Approximation methods that can be applied

What are approximation methods?

Approximation methods are mathematical techniques used to estimate or approximate the value of a function or a complex system. These methods are used when the exact solution is difficult or impossible to obtain.

What are some common approximation methods?

Some common approximation methods include Taylor series, polynomial approximation, finite difference methods, and Monte Carlo simulation. These methods can be applied to a wide range of problems in various fields such as physics, engineering, economics, and statistics.

When should approximation methods be used?

Approximation methods should be used when the exact solution is not necessary or not feasible. In many real-world problems, it is more important to have a quick and approximate answer than to spend a lot of time and resources to obtain the exact solution.

How accurate are approximation methods?

The accuracy of approximation methods depends on the complexity of the problem and the chosen method. Some methods, such as Taylor series, can provide very accurate results while others, such as Monte Carlo simulation, may have a higher margin of error. It is important to carefully choose the appropriate method for each problem to achieve the desired level of accuracy.

Can approximation methods be applied to all types of functions?

No, not all functions can be approximated using the same methods. Some methods work better for certain types of functions, such as polynomials, while others may be more suitable for complex or non-linear functions. It is important to understand the properties of the function and choose the appropriate method accordingly.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
699
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
547
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top