Approximations used in solving for the electric field

In summary, a uniformly charged rod with length L on the z-axis and charge density 'λ' has an electric field of E = (λ/4πεx)*(L/√(x_squared + (L_squared/4))) in the x hat direction at a point x away from the midpoint of the rod, when the distance x is very far away (x>>L). This can be simplified to E = λL/4πεx_squared. Another approach is to factor out the x_squared from the denominator and then apply the approximation to get the same final answer.
  • #1
AeroKaro
5
0

Homework Statement


Suppose we have a rod of length L oriented on the z-axis so that the bottom end is at z= - L/2 and the top end if at z = L/2. Furthermore, the rod is uniformly charged with charge density 'λ'. Now we are interested in finding the electric field at a point x away from the midpoint of the rod. If this distance is very far away so that x>>L. What is the electric field at x?

Homework Equations


E = (λ/4πεx)*(L/√(x_squared + (L_squared/4))), in the x hat direction.
(Sorry for the mess, I'm new here and am not familiar with Latex or any other methods of typing mathematical equations).

The Attempt at a Solution


Now my intuition tells me that if x>>L, then x/L>>1 or L/x must equal about 0. I see an L/x term in my equation and if I apply the latter approximation my electric field becomes zero. If I am very, very far away from the charged rod, I shouldn't feel its effects. However, another solution I see is to factor out the x_squared from the denominator to get E = (λ/4πεx_squared)*(L/√(1 + (L_squared/4x_squared))) THEN apply the approximation to get rid of the L_squared/4x_squared term and arrive at a final answer of E = λL/4πεx_squared, in the x hat direction. What is wrong with my initial attempt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi. Nothing wrong with your initial shot: the L/x factor stays in there (after all you are looking at te x-dependence) and you get $$|E| = {\lambda L\over 4 \pi\varepsilon_0 x^2} = {1\over 4 \pi\varepsilon_0} \, {Q\over x^2} $$ just like from a simple charge at the origin -- and just like your second approach.

By the way: Hello Karo, :welcome: (in case you weren't welcomed yet).

##\LaTeX## is fun. Check out the intros. Start with ##\#\# ## a^2 + b^2 = c^2 ##\#\# ## to get ## a^2 + b^2 = c^2 ##.
Proceed with right-mouse click over an equation and "Show math as ##\TeX## commands"
 

FAQ: Approximations used in solving for the electric field

What is an approximation?

An approximation is a simplified or estimated value that is used in place of an exact value in order to make calculations easier.

Why are approximations used in solving for the electric field?

Approximations are used in solving for the electric field because the equations involved can be very complex and difficult to solve exactly. By using approximations, scientists can simplify the calculations and still get a reasonably accurate answer.

What are some common approximations used in solving for the electric field?

One common approximation used in solving for the electric field is the point charge approximation, which assumes that the charge is concentrated at a single point. Another is the dipole approximation, which assumes that the charges are separated by a small distance compared to the distance from the charges to the point of interest.

How accurate are these approximations?

The accuracy of these approximations depends on the specific situation and the level of precision needed. In general, they can provide a good estimate of the electric field, but for more complex or precise calculations, more accurate methods may be needed.

Are there any situations where approximations should not be used in solving for the electric field?

Yes, there are some situations where approximations should not be used. For example, if the charges involved are very close together or if the electric field is changing rapidly with distance, then more accurate methods should be used to avoid significant errors in the calculation.

Back
Top