Boson statistics and the uncertainty principle

In summary: We will have to think about this more, but you have helped a lot.In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between boson statistics and the uncertainty principle. It is explained that when creating a particle at a certain position, there is an equal probability for all momentum states, which is in line with the uncertainty principle. However, when adding a particle to a state with 99 bosons with momentum k, the new particle is more likely to have momentum k by a factor of 100. This raises the question of whether this violates the uncertainty principle, to which it is clarified that the whole state of indistinguishable particles needs to be considered and if the added particle is localized better than the other particles, the bosonic enhancement factor
  • #1
neerajareen
17
0
This question is regarding the boson statistics and it’s relation to the uncertainty principle. Consider we have a vacuum state and we apply a field operator on it to create a particle at position x, we end up with state like

\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{e^{ - ipx}}} \left| p \right\rangle
\end{array}

So there is an equal probability for all momentum. And the result is completely consistent with the uncertainty principle.
Now consider a situation where we have created 99 bosons with momentum k. Using the statistics of creation of creation operators, when we now add an additional particle, we have


\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {e^{ - i{p_1}x}}\left| {1,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_2}x}}\left| {0,1,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_k}x}}\sqrt {100} \left| {0,0,100,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_{k + 1}}x}}\left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle
\end{array}/

We see that that when we create the now particle, it is more likely to have momentum k than any other momentum by a factor of 100. In the limit that we have a thousand billion particles in a certain momentum and then create a particle at a certain position, with almost 100% we can determine the momentum that it will have. Does this not violate the uncertainty principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
just to clarify

/dag is the dagger symbol (hermitian conjugate).
 
  • #3
neerajareen said:
This question is regarding the boson statistics and it’s relation to the uncertainty principle. Consider we have a vacuum state and we apply a field operator on it to create a particle at position x, we end up with state like

\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{e^{ - ipx}}} \left| p \right\rangle
\end{array}

So there is an equal probability for all momentum. And the result is completely consistent with the uncertainty principle.
Now consider a situation where we have created 99 bosons with momentum k. Using the statistics of creation of creation operators, when we now add an additional particle, we have


\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {e^{ - i{p_1}x}}\left| {1,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_2}x}}\left| {0,1,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_k}x}}\sqrt {100} \left| {0,0,100,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_{k + 1}}x}}\left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle
\end{array}/

We see that that when we create the now particle, it is more likely to have momentum k than any other momentum by a factor of 100. In the limit that we have a thousand billion particles in a certain momentum and then create a particle at a certain position, with almost 100% we can determine the momentum that it will have. Does this not violate the uncertainty principle?


What does your notation [itex]\left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle[/itex] mean?
 
  • #4
In order to have an effect of boson statistics, you need indistinguishable particles. So you do not get n individual particles, but one n-particle state. So in adding a particle, you go from the n-1 to the n-particle state. It is the position and momentum of the whole state of indistinguishable particles you need to consider. If this whole state has a pretty sharp momentum, it will be rather delocalized. If you (let us just assume that is possible somehow) create a particle that is localized better than the n-1 particle state, the added particle and the other particles cannot be completely indistinguishable, so the bosonic enhancement factor will not be n, but smaller.
 
  • #5
Thank you Cthuga. That makes sense
 

FAQ: Boson statistics and the uncertainty principle

1. What is the difference between Fermi-Dirac statistics and Bose-Einstein statistics?

Fermi-Dirac statistics apply to particles with half-integer spin, such as electrons and protons. These particles are known as fermions and follow the Pauli exclusion principle, meaning that no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state. On the other hand, Bose-Einstein statistics apply to particles with integer spin, such as photons and mesons. These particles are known as bosons and do not follow the Pauli exclusion principle, allowing an unlimited number of bosons to occupy the same quantum state.

2. How does the uncertainty principle relate to Boson statistics?

The uncertainty principle, formulated by Werner Heisenberg, states that the more precisely we know the position of a particle, the less precisely we can know its momentum, and vice versa. This principle applies to both fermions and bosons, but in different ways. In fermions, the principle is related to the indistinguishability of particles, while in bosons, it is related to the wave-like nature of particles. In Bose-Einstein statistics, the uncertainty principle allows for a distribution of particles with different momenta to occupy the same quantum state, resulting in phenomena such as superfluidity and superconductivity.

3. What is the significance of the Bose-Einstein condensate?

The Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter that occurs when a large number of bosons are cooled to a very low temperature, close to absolute zero. In this state, all the bosons occupy the same quantum state, resulting in macroscopic quantum phenomena. The BEC was first predicted by Satyendra Nath Bose and Albert Einstein and was experimentally observed in 1995, leading to a Nobel Prize in Physics for the researchers involved.

4. Can bosons exhibit both particle-like and wave-like behavior?

Yes, bosons can exhibit both particle-like and wave-like behavior, known as wave-particle duality. This duality is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics and is observed in all types of particles, including bosons. In Bose-Einstein statistics, the wave-like behavior of bosons is crucial in understanding phenomena such as interference and diffraction.

5. How are Bose-Einstein statistics relevant in modern physics?

Bose-Einstein statistics have numerous applications in modern physics, including in the fields of quantum mechanics, condensed matter physics, and cosmology. They are used to explain phenomena such as superconductivity, superfluidity, and Bose-Einstein condensation. Additionally, Bose-Einstein statistics play a crucial role in the understanding of elementary particles and their interactions, as well as in the development of quantum technologies such as quantum computing and quantum cryptography.

Similar threads

Back
Top