Calculate Diameter of an Icosahedron from Cross-sectional Widths

  • Thread starter botbml
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Dimensions
In summary, the biologist has a dataset of measurements of the maximal cross-sectional width of icosahedral bodies inside bacteria, which can be used to calculate dimensional data. However, the mean of the dataset will be less than the average circumscribed sphere diameter. The biologist is seeking help on how to calculate a value close to the mean diameter of all balls in a box given that the value needed is poorly represented in the dataset. They also provide a formula for the mean radius in case of balls.
  • #1
botbml
1
0
Hi all,
I'm a biologist with a mathematical and statistical question. I have a dataset of measurements of the maximal cross-sectional width of icosahedral bodies inside bacteria. Since they are icosahedral, the cross-sectional width (if precisely through the middle of the object) is a measure of the diameter of the circumscribed sphere of the icosahedron, from which I should be able to calculate dimensional data. The problem is that, of course, I essentially have a dataset of values whose mean will be less than the average circumscribed sphere diameter!

Consider, as an example, determining the average volume of non-uniform (but similarly sized) balls in a box where the only known data is from a set of cross-sectional measurements of a sample of the balls. The measurements will be a range of diameters as the cross-section will sometimes be through the middle, sometimes near the top and sometimes near the bottom of the ball, and other values in between. The maximum measured diameter will be representative of the actual mean diameter of all the balls, but it will be one of very few measurements as outliers of a normal distribution. In addition, given that the diameter of balls in the box vary, the large size outliers may also represent a small cross-sectional measurement of a very large ball! How can I calculate a value close to the mean diameter of all balls in the box given that the value I need to use is poorly represented in the dataset?? Any help appreciated. Any further questions, please post.

Thanks and cheers,

botbml

An example dataset is attached. If anyone has any clues.
 

Attachments

  • distribution.bmp
    64.4 KB · Views: 549
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
We could assume that the measured mean equals the mean radius ##R_m##. The mean radius in case of balls is ##R_m=2 \displaystyle{\int_0^r}\sqrt{r^2-x^2}\,dx = \dfrac{\pi}{2}\,r^2## where ##r## is the true radius. The check of the distance between ##r## and the measured maximum is at the same time a measure for the sample size, i.e. if we actually hit a cross section through a center.
 

FAQ: Calculate Diameter of an Icosahedron from Cross-sectional Widths

How is the diameter of an icosahedron calculated from cross-sectional widths?

The diameter of an icosahedron can be calculated by using the Pythagorean theorem. First, measure the cross-sectional width of the icosahedron at its widest point. Then, divide this width by 2 to get the radius. Next, use the radius to calculate the distance from the center of the icosahedron to any of its vertices. This distance will be the diameter of the icosahedron.

Can the diameter of an icosahedron be calculated if the cross-sectional widths are not uniform?

Yes, the diameter of an icosahedron can still be calculated even if the cross-sectional widths are not uniform. However, the calculation will be more complex and will likely require advanced mathematical techniques such as integration or calculus.

Is the diameter of an icosahedron the same as its edge length?

No, the diameter of an icosahedron is not the same as its edge length. The diameter refers to the distance across the icosahedron passing through its center, while the edge length refers to the distance between two adjacent vertices of the icosahedron.

How accurate is the calculated diameter of an icosahedron from cross-sectional widths?

The accuracy of the calculated diameter will depend on the precision of the measurements taken for the cross-sectional widths. The more precise the measurements, the more accurate the calculated diameter will be. However, there may still be slight discrepancies due to the icosahedron's irregular shape.

Can the diameter of an icosahedron be measured directly?

Yes, the diameter of an icosahedron can be measured directly by using a ruler or caliper. However, this may be more challenging due to the icosahedron's complex shape. It is often easier and more accurate to calculate the diameter using the cross-sectional widths.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
783
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top