Calculating Maximum Net Force in Simple Harmonic Motion

In summary: NIn summary, the maximum net force on a .64 kg mass undergoing simple harmonic motion, with a position given by x(t) = (.16 m)cos(\pi t/16), is 9.9 x 10-3 N. This can be found by finding the acceleration, which is -w^2Acos(wt), and then using the equation Fmax = ma_max, where amax = -w^2A.
  • #1
Dark Visitor
215
0
The position of a .64 kg mass undergoing simple harmonic motion is given by x(t) = (.16 m)cos([tex]\pi[/tex]t/16). What is the maximum net force on the mass as it oscillates? (hints: First, match the quantities in the equation above to x(t) = Acos([tex]\omega[/tex]t). Next, recall that the max. net force equals the product of the mass and the maximum acceleration.)

* 3.9 x 10-3 N
* 9.9 x 10-3 N
* 1.3 x 10-3 N
* 6.3 N


I don't really understand this problem and I need some help. So if anyone would be willing to help, I would really appreciate it. Where do I begin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
well you know F=ma.

You don't have an expression for a. You know [itex]x(t)=0.16cos(\frac{\pi t}{16})[/itex]. Can you find a(t)?
 
  • #3
I don't understand how. Would it look anything like the x(t) one?
 
  • #4
Dark Visitor said:
I don't understand how. Would it look anything like the x(t) one?

x is a displacement. Do you know how to get velocity from displacement?
 
  • #5
Not that I know of. Please explain it to me.
 
  • #6
Dark Visitor said:
Not that I know of. Please explain it to me.

velocity is the rate of change of displacement: v= dx/dt

acceleration is the rate of change of velocity. Can you find acceleration now?
 
  • #7
So: a = dv/dt?

But how does that help me with this?
 
  • #8
Maybe try working on one of these problems at a time ;-D.

Acceleration and force will be maximal when a is at a maximum. Do you know how to do derivatives and do max/min problems?
 
  • #9
No I do not. :frown:
 
  • #10
Dark Visitor said:
No I do not. :frown:

well find a(t). Now think, cosine and sine are maximum when they equal to what number?
 
  • #11
I still don't understand how to do that when we don't know x, t, or v.
 
  • #12
Dark Visitor said:
I still don't understand how to do that when we don't know x, t, or v.

[tex]x=0.16cos(\frac{\pi t}{16})[/tex]


do you understand how to differentiate a function?
 
  • #13
No. How do I do that, and how does that help me with this (I mean where do I apply it)?
 
  • #14
Dark Visitor said:
No. How do I do that, and how does that help me with this (I mean where do I apply it)?

The entire problem relies on your knowledge of calculus. I must ask, if you do not know how to find the derivative of a function, how did you get this problem as homework?
 
  • #15
I don't know any calculus. I have only taken Algebra and Trig., and my teacher gave me these, so they must be using things I know, or should know. Any way you can explain that more in terms I can understand?
 
  • #16
Dark Visitor said:
I don't know any calculus. I have only taken Algebra and Trig., and my teacher gave me these, so they must be using things I know, or should know. Any way you can explain that more in terms I can understand?

read about is http://www.intmath.com/Differentiation/Differentiation-intro.php"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
Okay, I think I understand it a little better now. But where and how do I apply that to this problem?
 
  • #18
Dark Visitor said:
I don't know any calculus. I have only taken Algebra and Trig., and my teacher gave me these, so they must be using things I know, or should know. Any way you can explain that more in terms I can understand?

Dark Visitor said:
Okay, I think I understand it a little better now. But where and how do I apply that to this problem?

read http://www.analyzemath.com/calculus/Differentiation/trigonometric.html" as well
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
Okay, but I am still completely lost on this...
 
  • #20
Dark Visitor said:
Okay, but I am still completely lost on this...

Read up on differentiation some more. But for this problem you need to know these

y=sinkx, dy/dx=kcoskx

y=coskx, dy/dx=-ksinkx.

With these can you find a(t) given x(t)?
 
  • #21
Well, reading the problem over, it says to match the quantities in the above equation, which leaves me with:

A = .160 m and [tex]\omega[/tex] = [tex]\pi[/tex]/16

But I still don't understand where your differentiations come into play.
 
  • #22
Dark Visitor said:
Well, reading the problem over, it says to match the quantities in the above equation, which leaves me with:

A = .160 m and [tex]\omega[/tex] = [tex]\pi[/tex]/16

But I still don't understand where your differentiations come into play.

Because if you have x=Acos(ωt) and you want to find Fmax=mamax, chances are you will need 'a' to get 'amax'
 
  • #23
Okay, I see what you're saying. And it makes sense lol. But where do I go from here to get to a or amax?
 
  • #24
Dark Visitor said:
Okay, I see what you're saying. And it makes sense lol. But where do I go from here to get to a or amax?

Find 'a' and then you can get 'amax' from 'a'
 
  • #25
Well, do I need to use the equation:

a(t) = -w2Acos(wt) ?
 
  • #26
Dark Visitor said:
Well, do I need to use the equation:

a(t) = -w2Acos(wt) ?

yes that is what you'd get had you differentiated x(t).

so now that you know a(t). At what value,cos(ωt) maximum?
 
  • #27
In my notes, I have

amax = w2a

Is that what you are going for?
 
  • #28
Dark Visitor said:
In my notes, I have

amax = w2a

Is that what you are going for?

yes, but you did not follow the question template, so I really did not know what equations you had.

Had x been x=t5+etsin2t, you would need to differentiate.
 
  • #29
Sorry about that. I found it buried in my notes, and when I posted this, I didn't think I would need that, so I didn't have my notes out.

So what do I do now?
 
  • #30
Dark Visitor said:
Sorry about that. I found it buried in my notes, and when I posted this, I didn't think I would need that, so I didn't have my notes out.

So what do I do now?

amax2A.

Fmax=mamax

I think you can get Fmax from here
 
  • #31
Dark visitor, do you see the similarity between this problem and the engine problem. There we were looking for max velocity. So when you differentiate position with respect to t, the w pops out in front (chain rule) and sin becomes cos. D/dx again and you get -w*w*sin.

Next time you do this, please have all your notes out and for good heavens, my man, don't try to bite off so much in a weekend.:eek: Physics requires slow assimilation and lots of practice!
 
  • #32
Only one more thing, sorry.

Is the amplitude (A) .160 m? And is [tex]\omega[/tex] equal to[tex]\pi[/tex]/16?
 
  • #33
Dark Visitor said:
Only one more thing, sorry.

Is the amplitude (A) .160 m? And is [tex]\omega[/tex] equal to[tex]\pi[/tex]/16?

yes.
 
  • #34
Okay, thanks. Here is my work:

amax = ([tex]\pi[/tex]/16)2(.160 m)
= .00617 m/s2

Fmax = (.64 kg)(.00617 m/s2)
= .003949

or 3.9 * 10-3

Thanks a lot. I really appreciate all of your help.
 

FAQ: Calculating Maximum Net Force in Simple Harmonic Motion

What is Simple Harmonic Motion?

Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM) is a type of periodic motion where the restoring force is directly proportional to the displacement from equilibrium and always directed towards the equilibrium point. This results in a sinusoidal or oscillatory motion.

What is the formula for calculating the maximum net force in SHM?

The formula for calculating the maximum net force in SHM is Fmax = -kA, where Fmax is the maximum net force, k is the spring constant, and A is the amplitude of the motion.

How do you calculate the spring constant in SHM?

The spring constant, k, can be calculated by dividing the force applied to the spring by the displacement it causes. This can be represented by the equation k = F/x, where F is the force and x is the displacement.

What is the relationship between the maximum net force and the amplitude in SHM?

There is an inverse relationship between the maximum net force and the amplitude in SHM. This means that as the amplitude increases, the maximum net force decreases, and vice versa.

How is the maximum net force related to the period of the motion in SHM?

The maximum net force is directly proportional to the period of the motion in SHM. This means that as the period increases, the maximum net force also increases, and vice versa.

Back
Top