Can the Physics Department Waive the Additional Hour Requirement for My Minor?

  • Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Request
In summary, the individual is working on a physics minor, which requires 21 hours (13 advanced). They currently have 17 hours (9 advanced) and will be taking Thermal Physics in the Spring, which will bring their total to 20 hours (12 advanced). To fulfill the minimum of 21 hours, they would need to take another 3-hour class or a 1-hour Advanced Lab Seminar, which they believe would be pointless. They inquire about the possibility of the department waiving the additional hour, but it is deemed unreasonable. The individual does not want to take the Advanced Lab Seminar due to a 22-minute oral presentation requirement, and does not want to take another 3-hour
  • #1
Shackleford
1,656
2
I'm working on a physics minor, which is 21 hours (13 advanced). Right now, I have 17 hours (9 advanced). I'll be taking Thermal Physics in the Spring which will bring my total to 20 hours (12 advanced). To achieve the minimum of 21 hours, I'd have to take another 3-hour class. There is a 1-hour Advanced Lab Seminar I could take, but it would be totally pointless.

The physics department requires 21 hours (13 advanced). Is it reasonable to ask that they waive the additional hour? My goal is to graduate with my math major, physics minor Spring 2012. This would help me greatly achieve that end since I work and go to school part-time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't think it's reasonable. A physics minor already has a low threshold for achieving the requirements; why should they be lowered further?
 
  • #3
fss said:
I don't think it's reasonable. A physics minor already has a low threshold for achieving the requirements; why should they be lowered further?

I guess so. I was just wondering mostly for my convenience. 21 hours is the maximum number of hours that can be required for a minor at my university.
 
  • #4
Does your university allow students to do "directed study" or "independent study" for one or two credits? You'd have to pick a topic that isn't covered by the available courses and find a professor to supervise and evaluate you. Usually you write a report, or give a presentation, or do some kind of tangible project like a computer program.
 
  • #5
jtbell said:
Does your university allow students to do "directed study" or "independent study" for one or two credits? You'd have to pick a topic that isn't covered by the available courses and find a professor to supervise and evaluate you. Usually you write a report, or give a presentation, or do some kind of tangible project like a computer program.

They have classes called "Special Problems," but you can't use those to satisfy the advanced hours requirement.
 
  • #6
"There is a 1-hour Advanced Lab Seminar I could take, but it would be totally pointless."

That 1-hour gets you the minor though...
 
  • #7
Jokerhelper said:
"There is a 1-hour Advanced Lab Seminar I could take, but it would be totally pointless."

That 1-hour gets you the minor though...

Yeah. But you have to do a 22-minute oral presentation. Let's just say I don't do presentations.
 
  • #8
Shackleford said:
Yeah. But you have to do a 22-minute oral presentation. Let's just say I don't do presentations.
If you say you "just don't do presentations", then I think this Advanced Lab Seminar would be far from pointless, and could be one of the better spent single credits in your education.
 
  • #9
Ryker said:
If you say you "just don't do presentations", then I think this Advanced Lab Seminar would be far from pointless, and could be one of the better spent single credits in your education.

It's not something I can learn or deal with. I get far too nervous.
 
  • #10
The department has decided what constitutes a minor, and it looks like you will have the opportunity to take enough courses. So the only thing that's standing in your way is that you don't want to take the last course, because "I don't do presentations."

Why should the department give you a minor? "I want a minor but don't want to meet all the requirements for it" is not an argument that is likely to gain much traction.
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
The department has decided what constitutes a minor, and it looks like you will have the opportunity to take enough courses. So the only thing that's standing in your way is that you don't want to take the last course, because "I don't do presentations."

Why should the department give you a minor? "I want a minor but don't want to meet all the requirements for it" is not an argument that is likely to gain much traction.

It's not the last course. I've finished all of the required courses for the minor. Now, it's just up to me to fulfill the remaining number of advanced hours any way I want. I'd rather not have to take another 3-hour course when all I have left is 1 hour.
 
  • #12
I understand that you don't want to do presentations. So it's completely understandable that you don't want to do the 1-hour course.

However, that leaves you with only one option: take a 3-hours course. It isn't fun, but that's just how it works. You can try and request that you only need to do 20 hours, but I'm afraid that they're not going to allow that (why would they allow it?)...

So I don't see any other option then a 3-hours course... :frown:
 
  • #13
Shackleford said:
It's not the last course.

Yes it is. You need 21 hours. You have 20. You need one more course.

Your argument against getting the 21 seems to boil down to "but I don't want to take the 21st hour". Like I said, I don't think it's going to get much traction.
 
  • #14
Vanadium 50 said:
Yes it is. You need 21 hours. You have 20. You need one more course.

Your argument against getting the 21 seems to boil down to "but I don't want to take the 21st hour". Like I said, I don't think it's going to get much traction.

No. I don't want to take a 3-hour course when I only need 1 more hour.
 
  • #15
Then take the one-hour class. But you don't want to take that one either.

It boils down to "I don't want to", which is a poor reason not to have to fulfill the requirement.
 
  • #16
Vanadium 50 said:
Then take the one-hour class. But you don't want to take that one either.

It boils down to "I don't want to", which is a poor reason not to have to fulfill the requirement.

The main reason is so I can have a better chance of graduating on time Spring 2012. That would be my official reason.

Otherwise, I'll probably just take Introduction to Astrophysics next Fall.
 
  • #17
Presentations aren't so bad. Why do dislike them so much?
 
  • #18
Shackleford said:
That would be my official reason.

As opposed to the truth?

Other people got their minors by fulfilling the requirements. When you ask to have them waived, it cheapens their accomplishments. Particularly when the reason that you want to have them waived is "I just don't want to take them."

So I think the answer is clear - no, this is not a reasonable request.
 
  • #19
Vanadium 50 said:
As opposed to the truth?

Other people got their minors by fulfilling the requirements. When you ask to have them waived, it cheapens their accomplishments. Particularly when the reason that you want to have them waived is "I just don't want to take them."

So I think the answer is clear - no, this is not a reasonable request.

You're not listening. Stop with the lecturing tone. It's not that I don't want to fulfill the 21-hour requirement. I'd rather not take a 3-hour physics course when all I need is 1 hour. I would rather instead take a 3-hour math course that's required for my degree.

You're correct only on me not wanting to take the 1-hour Advanced Lab Seminar for my own personal reasons. They offer 1-4 hours of Special Problems. I would have taken one of those because they're a bit more flexible time-wise.

Oh, and I can also agree it's not a reasonable request.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Just take the 1 hour seminar. The only way you'll get over your phobia is to confront it directly.

I think it's highly unlikely you'll make it through life without ever having to give a presentation.
 
  • #21
Jack21222 said:
Just take the 1 hour seminar. The only way you'll get over your phobia is to confront it directly.

I think it's highly unlikely you'll make it through life without ever having to give a presentation.

I had to give one in my Texas History class a couple of semesters ago. I went up there and just read from my paper. I later found out that's apparently the cardinal sin when giving presentations! Haha.
 
  • #22
Shackleford said:
You're not listening.

I am listening. However, what I am hearing is utterly and completely without merit.

You want a minor. You need at least one more hour.
The Special Problems courses do not count for a minor.
You don't want to take the 3 hour course.
You don't want to take the 1 hour course.

Fair enough, but this is no reason for a department to relax its requirements. You can make choices that will earn you the minor. You can make different choices, but you shouldn't act surprised when they don't get you the minor.
 
  • #23
Shackleford said:
I had to give one in my Texas History class a couple of semesters ago. I went up there and just read from my paper. I later found out that's apparently the cardinal sin when giving presentations! Haha.

And now, you'll never make that mistake again--you've learned better. What was that you said about giving presentations not being something you could learn?

Don't take this the wrong way, but I feel like your approach to this thread is more along the lines of, "tell me I can get away with this" than "can I get away with this?" You seem to know what you want: you'd like the minor, but you need 1 more credit. You'd prefer not to take a 3-cr course to get that 1 credit, but you'd prefer that over taking the 1-cr course. So I guess what it comes down to is, is the minor worth it to you? And if so, does your aversion for the 1-cr class exceed your reluctance to take the 3-cr class?
 
  • #24
Shackleford said:
I had to give one in my Texas History class a couple of semesters ago. I went up there and just read from my paper. I later found out that's apparently the cardinal sin when giving presentations! Haha.

Yes, because I'm sure you're the only person in the world who's ever gotten stage fright. I used to have it too. Then I buckled down and realized that it's no different than talking to a single person face to face. I doubt you'd fail if you stuck to your script. Do you want the minor? Then suck it up and do it.
 
  • #25
You're going to have to present your Ph.D to a group of experts in your field eventually. Take the one hour class. Eventually when you start to do research you'll have to give talks and you might have to do lectures some day if you happen to get a TA job. There are more possibilities as well, but of course you're not stupid and you can figure them out yourself.

Really, your refusal to stand up to your problems is, politely put, childish.
 
  • #26
Shackleford said:
I had to give one in my Texas History class a couple of semesters ago. I went up there and just read from my paper. I later found out that's apparently the cardinal sin when giving presentations! Haha.

Shackleford, for what it's worth, I agree with others that learning to give presentations is an important skill. I have found it to be an extremely important skill, and it has definitely enhanced my career. I've written and given small presentations to handfulls of people, all the way up to groups of hundreds of people. And with just a few techniques and some practice, it is very manageable.

So I'd suggest that you look at this dilema as an opportunity. It's an opportunity for you to address the current feelings that you have about giving presentations, and gain some experience in getting more comfortable in doing them. In addition to taking the 1-credit class, I'd suggest doing some learning and practicing on the side, so that when the time comes for giving the presentation, you are already more comfortable doing so. It will definitely enhance the things that you can do in your professional career.

One good resource is the Toastmasters group:

http://www.toastmasters.org/

It's a good way to gain practice and learn many tips for giving public presentations. You should be able to find a group near you to check out and see if it would be practical to learn from them. Best of luck!
 
  • #27
I'm not expecting the department to relax its requirements. I was merely wondering if they do sometimes, especially when it would be only a 1-hour waiver. My line of thinking is 20/21 hours - really, what's the difference? But, of course, I don't expect them to cater to my preferences. Again, perhaps, I didn't phrase it correctly, I was wondering if departments sometimes make minor waivers for a case such as this.

As for stage fright, it's funny because I've played in church bands for years - on stage. That's no problem. My problem is all the attention. I don't like attention on me.

One of the old guys at work talked to me about Toastmasters. He said it helped him tremendously.

At any rate, I still have many months to do decide what I want to do.
 
  • #28
Shackleford said:
I'm not expecting the department to relax its requirements. I was merely wondering if they do sometimes, especially when it would be only a 1-hour waiver. My line of thinking is 20/21 hours - really, what's the difference? But, of course, I don't expect them to cater to my preferences. Again, perhaps, I didn't phrase it correctly, I was wondering if departments sometimes make minor waivers for a case such as this.

As for stage fright, it's funny because I've played in church bands for years - on stage. That's no problem. My problem is all the attention. I don't like attention on me.

One of the old guys at work talked to me about Toastmasters. He said it helped him tremendously.

At any rate, I still have many months to do decide what I want to do.

Well I'm sure that to answer your question, no I don't think (in my experience at least) departments make minor waivers. And I do agree with the vast majority of people here in saying that you should take the 1 hour course. I hear that you don't like the attention on you, but turn the attention onto the audience. Ask them questions and get them involved. Turn it around a bit and put the emphasis on them paying attention and answering questions.
 
  • #29
PhysDrew said:
Well I'm sure that to answer your question, no I don't think (in my experience at least) departments make minor waivers. And I do agree with the vast majority of people here in saying that you should take the 1 hour course. I hear that you don't like the attention on you, but turn the attention onto the audience. Ask them questions and get them involved. Turn it around a bit and put the emphasis on them paying attention and answering questions.

That's part of the presentation. The class is supposed to ask questions about your particular project. I'll consider it. It's supposed to be a group project with the 45 minutes split between two people.
 
  • #30
Shackleford said:
As for stage fright, it's funny because I've played in church bands for years - on stage. That's no problem. My problem is all the attention. I don't like attention on me.
Well, a stage is just a metaphor, stage fright doesn't have anything to do with stages per se, it's about attention on yourself. I was always scared of presentations, as well, but I never considered not taking a course because of it. But if your fears are manifest to such an extent, then I think that is the most compelling argument for why it is imperative you take this course, or if not this one, another one where you will gain experience in giving talks to other people.
 
  • #31
How do you know that the lab program is pointless, when you haven't done it. Do you believe that the people running the lab program think it is pointless? Are you really saying that there is nothing to learn?
 
  • #32
pongo38 said:
How do you know that the lab program is pointless, when you haven't done it. Do you believe that the people running the lab program think it is pointless? Are you really saying that there is nothing to learn?

Yes. I'm saying the advanced lab and seminar are entirely pointless. I don't know why they require it for physics majors in preparation for research!
 
  • #33
Ignoring the part where that doesn't actually answer the question, "how do you know the lab program is pointless"...

The standard pre-med track involves introductory physics. How useful do you suppose that to a practicing doctor? Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately), it's not really up to the students to decide what's required or not. If one wants the degree, one has to jump through all the hoops.
 
  • #34
Leveret said:
Ignoring the part where that doesn't actually answer the question, "how do you know the lab program is pointless"...

The standard pre-med track involves introductory physics. How useful do you suppose that to a practicing doctor? Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately), it's not really up to the students to decide what's required or not. If one wants the degree, one has to jump through all the hoops.

Hopefully, I was clearly being sarcastic. I don't plan on going into research or doing a thesis. The advanced labs prepare students for that kind of work.

However, I agree it wouldn't be useless for me. I would still learn some practical things that could prove useful in the future.
 
  • #35
Ah, my apologies, then. It's hard to catch that stuff on the web :P
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top