Composite Functions: Is (f o g)^-1 = gof?

In summary, the conversation discusses whether or not f o g is a function and if (f o g)^-1 = gof, with the conclusion being that the first part is true but the second part is false. It is also mentioned that (gof)^-1 actually equals f^-1og^-1, and that it is a function from C to A.
  • #1
Monsu
38
1
If f:A -> B and g:B -> C are functions, is this true: f o g is also a function and (f o g) ^-1 = gof

I think this isn't true, but if this isn't the case, could someone please tell me a counter example?? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
the first part is true, but the send part is false. since it is an and statement the entire statement is false. if it were an or statement, it would be true.

I think I am right but I can't remember right now if the mapping from A to B gets changed when you take the inverse or what. either way, it should not be a function any more.
 
  • #3
fog is not a function, composition reads from right to left. gof is a function.
 
  • #4
Assuming f:A->B and g:B->C then gof is a function from A to C.

No, it is NOT true that (gof)-1= fog. As matt grime pointed out, that's not even a function: g goes from B to C and C is not the domain of f.

What IS true, in this case, is that (gof)-1= f-1og-1 which is probably what you meant.

Notice that, since f:A->B, f-1:B->A and, since g:B->C, g-1:C->B. That means that both (gof)-1 and f-1og-1 are from C to A.
 

FAQ: Composite Functions: Is (f o g)^-1 = gof?

What is a composite function?

A composite function is a combination of two or more functions where the output of one function is used as the input for another function. This is denoted as f o g, with f and g being the individual functions.

How do you find the inverse of a composite function?

To find the inverse of a composite function (f o g)^-1, you need to first find the inverse of each individual function. Then, you can switch the order of the functions and combine them to get gof.

Is (f o g)^-1 always equal to gof?

No, (f o g)^-1 is only equal to gof if both f and g are invertible functions. If one or both of the functions are not invertible, then (f o g)^-1 and gof will not be equal.

How can I prove that (f o g)^-1 = gof?

To prove that (f o g)^-1 = gof, you can use the definition of inverse functions. This involves showing that (f o g)(gof(x)) = x and (g o f)(fog(x)) = x for all values of x in the domains of f and g.

Can the order of the functions in a composite function be changed?

Yes, the order of functions in a composite function can be changed. However, this will only result in the same output if both functions are commutative, meaning that the order of the inputs and outputs does not affect the result. Otherwise, changing the order of the functions will result in a different composite function.

Similar threads

A Partial / Total Derivative, Compositions
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Domain and the codomain of a composite function
Replies
8
Views
4K
I Substitution in a definite integral
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Is My Proof of the Chain Rule Correct?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I On inverse function theorem in Spivak's CoM
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Doubt about theorem in Calculus on Manifolds
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Some questions on l'Hôpital rules
Replies
9
Views
2K
A Existence of a limit implies that a function can be harmonic extended
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Show that the set is a partition of A
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Show that the two functions are identical
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top