Computing a surface integral with polar coordinates

In summary: Alternatively, if you are given only {y > 0, z > 0} OR {x > 0, y > 0}, then it would be in the 2nd quadrant, as the required section of the graph is between the x and y axes but not on the x-y plane.
  • #1
Yami
20
0

Homework Statement


Show that ##\iint_{S}(x^2 + y^2)d\sigma = \frac{9\pi}{4}##
where ##S = \{(x,y,z): x > 0, y > 0, 3 > z > 0, z^2 = 3(x^2 + y^2)\}##

Homework Equations


##\iint_{S}f(x,y,z)d\sigma = \iint_{R}f(r(x,y))\sqrt{[r_x(x,y)]^2 + [r_y(x,y)]^2 + 1}##
where ##r : R → ℝ^3, R \in ℝ^2## parametrizes the surface S.

The Attempt at a Solution



##\iint_{S}(x^2 + y^2)d\sigma = \iint_{R}(x^2 + y^2)\sqrt{\frac{9^2}{3(x^2 + y^2)} + \frac{9^2}{3(x^2 + y^2)}+ 1}dxdy##
## = \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{3}r^2\sqrt{\frac{9r^2}{3r^2} + 1} drd\theta## (polar coordinates)
##= \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{3}2r^2drd\theta = 36\pi##

This is obviously wrong. I'm guessing I have the wrong domain restrictions
##R = \{ (r, \theta) : 0 < \theta < 2\pi, 0 < r < 3\}##
If so, I can't figure out how to get the correct restriction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You should draw the graph to find the limits. S is the surface of a cone in the first octant.
[tex]z=\pm \sqrt{3x^2+3y^2}[/tex]
But since we are considering the cone in the 1st octant, where [itex]z≥0[/itex], thus:
[tex]z=\sqrt{3x^2+3y^2}[/tex]
Find [itex]z_x[/itex] and [itex]z_y[/itex] as you'll be projecting the surface S onto the x-y plane.

The surface area in terms of Cartesian coordinates:
[tex]\iint_{S}(x^2 + y^2)d\sigma = \iint_{Ω} (x^2 + y^2) \sqrt {(z_x)^2+(z_y)^2+1} \,.dxdy=\iint_{Ω} (x^2 + y^2) \sqrt {\frac{12x^2+12y^2}{3x^2+3y^2}} \,.dxdy=2\iint_{Ω} (x^2 + y^2) \,.dxdy[/tex] where Ω is the projection of S onto the x-y plane.

To find the equation of the points of intersection of the plane z = 3 and the cone, substitute z = 3 into the equation of the cone.
[tex]3^2=3x^2+3y^2
\\x^2+y^2=3
\\r^2=3[/tex]
The projected area in terms of polar coordinates:
[tex]2 \iint_Ω r^2 \,.rdrd\theta[/tex]
Now, using the graph of the region Ω, find the limits. See attached graph.

But from the projection onto the x-y plane, you only need a quarter of Ω (since the section of surface S required is found in the 1st octant), so [itex]0\le \theta \le \pi /2[/itex]
 

Attachments

  • graph.gif
    graph.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 443
Last edited:
  • #3
Alright, I got it. Thanks for your help.
I think I get the gist of the radians restriction; so if we have just x > 0, y > 0, but no z > 0 would it be ##R = \{(r, \theta); 0 < r < \sqrt{3}, 0 < \theta < \pi\}##?
 
  • #4
Yami said:
Alright, I got it. Thanks for your help.
I think I get the gist of the radians restriction; so if we have just x > 0, y > 0, but no z > 0 would it be ##R = \{(r, \theta); 0 < r < \sqrt{3}, 0 < \theta < \pi\}##?
You are correct except for the limits of [itex]\theta[/itex], which should be:
[tex]0 < \theta < \pi /2[/tex] as the surface area that this problem requires is found in the first octant, or in case of no z-axis, then it's the 1st quadrant.
 
  • #5
Okay so if it's just {y > 0, but no x > 0, z > 0} OR {x > 0, but no y > 0, z > 0}, two quadrants of the space, then would it be ##0 < \theta < \pi##?
 
  • #6
Yami said:
Okay so if it's just {y > 0, but no x > 0, z > 0} OR {x > 0, but no y > 0, z > 0}, two quadrants of the space, then would it be ##0 < \theta < \pi##?

Draw the Cartesian axes in a 3D coordinate system; x, y and z, perpendicular to each other. Label them with simple values {-1,0,1} for each axis. For example, if x > 0, then it means you are only considering the positive x axis. As you are given more limits, you will be able to progressively pinpoint the exact octant required.

Likewise, if y > 0, it means the graph is along the positive y axis. You can apply this simple means of knowing the required section of graph by determining which octant or quadrant is related to the problem.

In your original problem, {x > 0, y > 0, 0 < z < 3}. Consider x > 0 and y > 0. This automatically places the required section of the graph in the first quadrant, but since your problem involves 3D coordinates, you now have an additional upper and lower dimension (the z axis). If z > 0, then the section is found in the 1st quadrant but above the z axis, meaning in the positive (upper) direction of the axis, in other words, the 1st octant. If z < 0, then it's obviously below the x-y plane, meaning, the required section of the graph is along the negative z axis.
 

FAQ: Computing a surface integral with polar coordinates

How do you set up the integral for computing a surface integral with polar coordinates?

The integral for computing a surface integral with polar coordinates can be set up by first determining the limits of integration for the polar coordinates, which are usually given in terms of theta (θ) and radius (r). These limits will define the region on the surface that will be integrated over. Then, the integrand (the function being integrated) must be expressed in terms of polar coordinates.

2. What is the difference between a surface integral with polar coordinates and a regular double integral?

A surface integral with polar coordinates is used to calculate the surface area of a region on a curved surface, while a regular double integral is used to calculate the volume under a surface. Surface integrals with polar coordinates use polar coordinates (r and θ) instead of Cartesian coordinates (x and y) to describe points on the surface.

3. What is the significance of the Jacobian when computing a surface integral with polar coordinates?

The Jacobian is a term that appears in the integrand when converting from Cartesian to polar coordinates. It represents the change in variables from x and y to r and θ, and it is necessary to include it in the integral when using polar coordinates. The Jacobian can be thought of as a scaling factor that accounts for the difference in area between a small square in Cartesian coordinates and a small sector in polar coordinates.

4. How do you evaluate a surface integral with polar coordinates?

To evaluate a surface integral with polar coordinates, first set up the integral with the appropriate limits of integration and the integrand expressed in terms of polar coordinates. Then, use techniques such as trigonometric identities or substitution to simplify the integrand. Finally, integrate the simplified expression and evaluate the integral over the given limits of integration.

5. What are some real-world applications of computing surface integrals with polar coordinates?

Surface integrals with polar coordinates have many applications in physics, engineering, and other scientific fields. They can be used to calculate the mass or charge distribution on a curved surface, the flux of a vector field through a curved surface, or the electric potential on a spherical surface, among others. They are also used in the design and analysis of curved structures, such as bridges, domes, and satellite dishes.

Back
Top