Converting the Electric Field of a Dipole from Cartesian to Spherical Coords

In summary, the electric field on the positive z-axis can be expressed as E_z = [2cos^2(theta) - sin^2(theta)] / r^3 * (p/4piEo), which is equivalent to the electric field from E_r = [2p*cos^2(theta)] / [4piEo*r^3] when properly substituted for z in terms of r and theta.
  • #1
albertoid
7
0

Homework Statement



Show that [tex]
E_z = \frac{p}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left( \frac{3z^2}{r^5} - \frac{1}{r^3} \right)
[/tex] is equivalent to the electric field on the positive z-axis from [tex]
E_r = \frac{2 p \cos \theta}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3}
[/tex]

Homework Equations



The unit normal for a sphere, sin0cos%, sin0sin%, cos0 (0 is theta; % is phi)
z = rcos0

The Attempt at a Solution



I multiplied E_r by cos0 (the z component of the unit vector in spherical coordinates)
and got 2cos^2 theta /r^3 (times p/4piEo)However, simplifying E_z I get [2cos^2 theta - sin^2 theta]/r^3 (times p/4piEo)

I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong, any guidance would be appreciated!Edit: solved. Forgot to consider a value for theta
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
.

Hello,

Thank you for sharing your attempt at a solution. It looks like you are on the right track, but there are a few things that need to be corrected in your approach.

First, when you multiplied E_r by cos0, you should have also multiplied the p/4piEo term. This would give you [2p*cos^2(theta)] / [4piEo*r^3].

Next, in order to simplify E_z, you need to substitute in the expression for z in terms of r and theta. This would give you [3z^2/r^5 - 1/r^3] * (p/4piEo).

Now, using the equation z = rcos(theta), we can substitute in for z to get [3(r*cos(theta))^2/r^5 - 1/r^3] * (p/4piEo).

Simplifying this expression gives you [3cos^2(theta) - 1] / r^3 * (p/4piEo).

Finally, we can use the trigonometric identity cos^2(theta) = 1 - sin^2(theta) to substitute in for cos^2(theta) and get [2cos^2(theta) - sin^2(theta)] / r^3 * (p/4piEo).

As you can see, this is the same expression that you got for E_r when you multiplied by cos0, but now we have properly substituted in for z in terms of r and theta.

I hope this helps clarify your approach and leads you to the correct solution. Good luck!
 

FAQ: Converting the Electric Field of a Dipole from Cartesian to Spherical Coords

How do you convert the electric field of a dipole from Cartesian to spherical coordinates?

To convert the electric field of a dipole from Cartesian to spherical coordinates, you can use the following equations:

Er = Exsinθcosφ + Eysinθsinφ + Ezcosθ

Eθ = Excosθcosφ + Eycosθsinφ - Ezsinθ

Eφ = -Exsinφ + Eycosφ

What are the advantages of converting the electric field of a dipole from Cartesian to spherical coordinates?

Converting the electric field of a dipole from Cartesian to spherical coordinates can make calculations easier, especially for problems involving spherical symmetry. It can also help in visualizing the direction of the electric field in relation to the dipole and the origin.

Can the conversion be done for any point in space?

Yes, the conversion can be done for any point in space as long as the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) of that point are known.

What is the difference between Cartesian and spherical coordinates?

Cartesian coordinates use three perpendicular axes (x, y, z) to locate a point in space, while spherical coordinates use two angles (θ and φ) and a distance (r) from the origin to locate a point. Spherical coordinates are often used in problems involving spherical symmetry, while Cartesian coordinates are used for general calculations.

How does converting to spherical coordinates affect the magnitude of the electric field of a dipole?

Converting to spherical coordinates does not change the magnitude of the electric field of a dipole. It only changes the direction of the electric field vectors at different points in space.

Similar threads

Back
Top