Equilibrium of an object orbiting around a planet

In summary, the rod is in equilibrium when the gravitational force is equal to the centripetal force.
  • #1
Jahnavi
848
102

Homework Statement


question.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Honestly , I have not been able to understand the question . I am totally clueless about the part written in parenthesis .

All I understand is that since the length of the rod is not negligible ,value of gravity at the location of the two masses is different .

I would really appreciate if someone could help me understand the problem statement and nudge me in the right direction .

Thank you .
 

Attachments

  • question.png
    question.png
    37.5 KB · Views: 883
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The parenthesis means this:
If something disturbs the rate of rotation of the rod, the angular momentum would to a first order be conserved and the rod could rotate to a point where it is for example parallel to the surface of the planet, in which case you have something totally different. They want the angular momentum of the rod to be fixed. This is not entirely unreasonable - the moon is also gravity-locked in a similar way. This should also tell you that the situation is probably stable. You already guessed correctly that the gravity is different and that the rod should then probably be in tension.

Now comes the hardest part: Why is the situation stable?
What I would do is write down an energy balance for a slightly rotated rod and see if the perpendicular state has the lowest energy. Hint: You probably need spherical/cylindrical coordinates.
 
  • #3
Thanks for replying .

The first thing I would like to understand is how the rod is able to remain vertical at all times . For this to happen , the farther mass ( say A ) should be traveling at a higher speed ( so as to cover larger diatance ) than the closer mass( say B ) . I am thinking of how a satellite in orbit of larger radius has smaller speed .
 
  • #4
This is a good question. But you need to think of it in broader terms. Mass B feels a larger gravitational attraction and it is too slow for its orbit. So there's a slight pull inward. Same with A and outward. There's apparently no torque acting on the system, just tension. Now the actual question that you need to answer is this: If you're putting the rod slightly off from the vertical line, there will be some torque. Is it pulling the system back to vertical, so that the configuration is stable? Or is it pulling the system away from that state, so that it is unstable?
 
  • #5
Gigaz said:
Mass B feels a larger gravitational attraction and it is too slow for its orbit. So there's a slight pull inward.

Sorry . Please explain this .
 
  • #6
Jahnavi said:
Sorry . Please explain this .

So, if we're talking about circular orbits you have usually the condition that the gravitationfal force is equal to the centripetal force

$$F_G=GMm/r^2=mv^2/r=F_r$$

The object which we have here is in orbit, which means that the center of mass is at position r and has the velocity v.
The rod is at all times pointing in the radial direction. B is at the position r-L/2. The speed is also different. The rotation period stays the same, but the radius changes.
Now $$F_{G,B}-F_{r,B}$$ is not zero. You can calculate how large it is, and if the gravitational force or the centripetal force is larger for B, so if it is pulled inwards or pushed outwards.
 

FAQ: Equilibrium of an object orbiting around a planet

What is the definition of equilibrium in the context of an object orbiting around a planet?

Equilibrium refers to a state of balance or stability in which the forces acting on an object are equal and opposite, resulting in a constant and uniform motion. In the context of an object orbiting around a planet, equilibrium means that the gravitational force of the planet is balanced by the centrifugal force of the object's motion, allowing it to maintain a stable orbit.

How is the equilibrium of an object orbiting around a planet affected by changes in mass?

The equilibrium of an object orbiting around a planet is directly affected by changes in mass. The greater the mass of the object, the greater the gravitational force it exerts on the planet, and the stronger the centrifugal force required to maintain a stable orbit. Similarly, if the mass of the planet increases, the object will need to orbit at a faster speed to maintain equilibrium.

What is the role of the planet's gravitational force in maintaining equilibrium for an orbiting object?

The planet's gravitational force is the primary force responsible for maintaining equilibrium for an orbiting object. This force acts as an attractive force between the planet and the object, pulling the object towards the planet's center. Without this force, the object would continue to move in a straight line rather than orbiting around the planet.

How does the distance between the object and the planet affect its equilibrium?

The distance between the object and the planet directly affects its equilibrium. As the distance increases, the gravitational force decreases, resulting in a weaker pull towards the planet's center. This means that the object will need to orbit at a higher speed to maintain equilibrium. Conversely, if the distance decreases, the gravitational force will increase, requiring the object to orbit at a slower speed to maintain equilibrium.

Can the equilibrium of an object orbiting around a planet be disturbed?

Yes, the equilibrium of an object orbiting around a planet can be disturbed by external forces. For example, if another large object passes close to the orbiting object, its gravitational force can disrupt the equilibrium and cause the object's orbit to change. Similarly, if the orbiting object experiences a sudden change in speed or direction, its equilibrium can also be disturbed.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top