Existent solution to the linear system Ax=b

In summary: Since c is in the null-space of A, and x^T Ac = 0, then Ax must be in the null-space as well. Therefore, if b is not orthogonal to c, it cannot be in the null-space and there is no solution to the system Ax=b. In summary, if b is not orthogonal to c, the solution to the system Ax=b does not exist. This is because c spans the null-space of A and if b is not orthogonal to c, it cannot be in the null-space and there is no solution to the system.
  • #1
onako
86
0
Suppose that the linear system Ax=b is given for some symmetric A, and it is known that vector c spans the null-space of A.

How could one formally show that if b is not orthogonal to c, the solution to the system Ax=b does not exist?
To remind you, the null-space of A contains all vectors u for which Au=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Think about

[tex](Ax)^T c[/tex]

where x is an arbitrary vector and c spans the null-space.
 
  • #3
That would imply x^T Ac=x0=0. How do you relate this to the above problem?
 
  • #4
onako said:
Suppose that the linear system Ax=b is given for some symmetric A, and it is known that vector c spans the null-space of A.

How could one formally show that if b is not orthogonal to c, the solution to the system Ax=b does not exist?
To remind you, the null-space of A contains all vectors u for which Au=0.

Hey onako.

I'm assuming A is nxn (since you said it is symmetric). From this if c spans the null-space it must be an n-dimensional column vector.

From this you can use the decomposition argument that a basis can be broken into something and its perpendicular element (some books write it as v_perp + v = basis). Your zero vector c is perpendicular to b if you wish to have full rank.

If this is not the case, then you can show that you don't have full rank and that a solution should not exist. For specifics you should look at rank nullity, and for the v_perp + v = basis thingy, this is just a result of core linear algebra with spanning, dimension, and orthogonality.
 
  • #5
onako said:
That would imply x^T Ac=x0=0. How do you relate this to the above problem?

Doesn't this imply that Ax is perpendicular to c?
 

FAQ: Existent solution to the linear system Ax=b

What is an existent solution to a linear system?

An existent solution to a linear system refers to a set of values for the variables that satisfy all of the equations in the system. This means that when the values are substituted into each equation, the equation will be true.

How do you determine if a linear system has an existent solution?

A linear system has an existent solution if the number of equations is equal to the number of variables and the system is consistent (meaning there is at least one solution that satisfies all of the equations). This can be determined through various methods, such as elimination or substitution.

What happens if a linear system does not have an existent solution?

If a linear system does not have an existent solution, it is either inconsistent (meaning there is no solution that satisfies all of the equations) or has infinitely many solutions. This can happen if the equations are contradictory or if there are more variables than equations, resulting in an underdetermined system.

Can a linear system have more than one existent solution?

Yes, a linear system can have more than one existent solution if there are multiple sets of values for the variables that satisfy all of the equations. This is known as an overdetermined system, where there are more equations than variables.

How can you find the exact values of the existent solution to a linear system?

The exact values of the existent solution can be found by using various methods such as Gaussian elimination, Cramer's rule, or matrix inversion. These methods involve manipulating the equations to isolate the variables and solve for their values.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top