- #1
Fidelio
- 3
- 0
Hi!
1. Substituting an ansatz [itex]\Psi(x)= u(p) e^{(-i/h) xp} [/itex] into the Dirac equation and using [itex]\{\gamma^i,\gamma^j\} = 2 g^{ij}[/itex], show that the Dirac equation has both positive-energy and negative-energy solutions. Which are the allowed values of energy?
2. Starting from the DE, and using [itex]\Psi(x) = e^{(1 /i \hbar)}(\psi_u(\vec{x}), \psi_l(\vec{x}))^T[/itex], show that at the non-relativistic limit, the upper 2-component spinors, ##\psi_u(\vec {x})##, for the positive-energy solutions fullfill the Schrödinger equation while the lower spinors, ##\psi_l(\vec{x})##, vanish. Use the Dirac-Pauli representation.
Dirac equation (covariant form) [itex](i \hbar \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - mc) \Psi(x) = 0 [/itex]
[itex] \gamma^i = \beta \alpha_i[/itex] and [itex]\gamma^0 = \beta[/itex]
I have no idea where to start. Any suggestions are welcome.
Homework Statement
1. Substituting an ansatz [itex]\Psi(x)= u(p) e^{(-i/h) xp} [/itex] into the Dirac equation and using [itex]\{\gamma^i,\gamma^j\} = 2 g^{ij}[/itex], show that the Dirac equation has both positive-energy and negative-energy solutions. Which are the allowed values of energy?
2. Starting from the DE, and using [itex]\Psi(x) = e^{(1 /i \hbar)}(\psi_u(\vec{x}), \psi_l(\vec{x}))^T[/itex], show that at the non-relativistic limit, the upper 2-component spinors, ##\psi_u(\vec {x})##, for the positive-energy solutions fullfill the Schrödinger equation while the lower spinors, ##\psi_l(\vec{x})##, vanish. Use the Dirac-Pauli representation.
Homework Equations
Dirac equation (covariant form) [itex](i \hbar \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - mc) \Psi(x) = 0 [/itex]
[itex] \gamma^i = \beta \alpha_i[/itex] and [itex]\gamma^0 = \beta[/itex]
The Attempt at a Solution
I have no idea where to start. Any suggestions are welcome.
Last edited by a moderator: