Exploring the Relationship Between Mass and Time: A Scientific Inquiry

[Fractal314]

Far_t = v²

Far_t = Fg

Therefore, Fg = v²

Fg = weight

Fg = ma_y

v²_y = ma_y

v = square root of ma

v = at

square root of ma = at

the a's cancel out and I'm left with square root m = t


m=mass , t=time , Fg=force of gravity , v=velocity , y=yaxis , ar=air resistance , ar_t=air resistance at terminal velocity , a=acceleration

This is obviously wrong, but what makes it so? As long as it is at terminal velocity and at y axis, in other words, uniform motion, there is obviously no way to come to terms with a relationship between mass and time, right?

 

[Topher925]

You lost me at the first line.

Fart = v2

Are you stating that the force from the air resistance on an object is equal to its velocity squared? Where did you get this relationship from?

 

[Fractal314]

force of air resistance at terminal velocity

 

[Topher925]

force of air resistance at terminal velocity

According to who or what law? Do you have a reference or a source for this equation?

 

[Danger]

This is a gag thread, right? We don't generally deal with the dynamics of farts here.

 

[Katrex]

This is probably completely unrlated but did I see somewhere distance being the squarroot of time?

 

[Integral]

In order for the first relationship to hold you need to throw in a proportionality constant with the correct units to make that a consistent statement. Force does not have the same units as velocity squared so something is missing.