Exploring Time Loops: Quantum Entanglement and Superluminal Exchange Experiments

  • Thread starter stglyde
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Loop Time
In summary, quantum entanglement involves superluminal exchange of information, but this does not violate causality as the information cannot be used to send messages. However, there is still an exchange of randomness information between past and future, potentially allowing for messages from the future to alter the past. While there have been experiments, such as the Aspect experiment, that demonstrate this phenomenon, it is still unclear how to test it further. Some scientists believe that successful testing could lead to a Nobel Prize.
  • #1
stglyde
275
0
They say that if quantum entanglement were meditated by actually superluminal exchange, causality is not violated because you can't use it to send information. This is because quantum randomness can't be control. But note there is still actual exchange of randomness information between past and future... that is.. messages from the future could actually alter the past in quantum entangelement that uses superluminal exchange scenerio). Now I just want to have an idea if there were other actual experiments where random information can go from future to past (time loop). Is there no way to test it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
stglyde said:
They say that if quantum entanglement were meditated by actually superluminal exchange, causality is not violated because you can't use it to send information. This is because quantum randomness can't be control. But note there is still actual exchange of randomness information between past and future... that is.. messages from the future could actually alter the past in quantum entangelement that uses superluminal exchange scenerio). Now I just want to have an idea if there were other actual experiments where random information can go from future to past (time loop). Is there no way to test it?

If you can figure out how to test it then you might get a phone call from Stockholm.
 
  • #3
PatrickPowers said:
If you can figure out how to test it then you might get a phone call from Stockholm.

Isn't it that in quantum entanglement like Aspect experiment.. there are frames in which either end would trigger the event back in time? This is because if someone occurs instantaneously in separate spacetime points.. there would always be frame in which one end receives it back in time.
 

FAQ: Exploring Time Loops: Quantum Entanglement and Superluminal Exchange Experiments

Q1: What is a time loop?

A time loop is a hypothetical phenomenon in which time repeats itself, either infinitely or for a finite number of loops. This concept is often explored in science fiction and theories of time travel.

Q2: What is quantum entanglement?

Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon in which two or more particles become connected in such a way that the state of one particle is dependent on the state of the other, even at great distances. This means that when one particle is observed, the other particle will immediately be affected, regardless of the distance between them.

Q3: How do time loops and quantum entanglement relate?

Some theories suggest that if a time loop were to occur, it could potentially involve quantum entanglement. This is because in a time loop, events are repeated, and if particles were entangled, their states would also be repeated, creating a loop in time.

Q4: What is superluminal exchange?

Superluminal exchange refers to the potential exchange of information or particles at speeds faster than the speed of light. This concept is still under investigation and has not been proven to be possible.

Q5: How are time loops and superluminal exchange experiments connected?

Some theories propose that by using superluminal exchange, it may be possible to send information or particles back in time, potentially leading to the creation of a time loop. However, this remains a highly speculative and unproven idea in the scientific community.

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Back
Top