Faster Than Light Theory #759310

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of traveling faster than light using a portable gravity well. The speakers question whether this would be possible and if it would require infinite energy. They also discuss the effects of gravity on mass and how it could potentially be used to propel a ship without causing discomfort to those on board.
  • #1
Gara
152
0
Okay, I'm proberly very wrong on many things of the following, also, I know no theory can be good with too many IF's, but here goes.

IF, some how, we made a portable gravity well of some kind.

IF this gravity well was strong enough to make the pull of 1000 G's, over the entire ship.

IF we then used this to pull us forward at 9800 m/s, for 30591.0671 seconds, (9800 m/s^2 * 30591.0671 = 299,792,458 m/s = C) would we then be going the speed of light?

Also, IF gravity pulls with the same force no matter the mass (hammer v's ping pong ball ect) even though we would be infinate mass, we should still only need the energy required to move us that same first few seconds to continue to accel at the same rate.

And, IF the gravity is pulling the entire ship and all the people in it at the same rate, we should not be smooshed into the back of our seats, yes?

What IF we then accel for 30592 seconds, would we then not be going faster than light?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Gara said:
Okay, I'm proberly very wrong on many things of the following, also, I know no theory can be good with too many IF's, but here goes.

IF, some how, we made a portable gravity well of some kind.

IF this gravity well was strong enough to make the pull of 1000 G's, over the entire ship.

IF we then used this to pull us forward at 9800 m/s, for 30591.0671 seconds, (9800 m/s^2 * 30591.0671 = 299,792,458 m/s = C) would we then be going the speed of light?

Also, IF gravity pulls with the same force no matter the mass (hammer v's ping pong ball ect) even though we would be infinate mass, we should still only need the energy required to move us that same first few seconds to continue to accel at the same rate.

And, IF the gravity is pulling the entire ship and all the people in it at the same rate, we should not be smooshed into the back of our seats, yes?

What IF we then accel for 30592 seconds, would we then not be going faster than light?

Wouldn't it be so much easier if you just start with "IF we can throw out all the laws of physics that we know of today...", then you wouldn't need to make so many IF's.

Zz.
 
  • #3
What is it with all these FTL threads?


I can see no value in them.
 

FAQ: Faster Than Light Theory #759310

What is "Faster Than Light Theory #759310"?

Faster Than Light Theory #759310 is a scientific concept that explores the possibility of faster than light travel, also known as FTL travel.

How does Faster Than Light Theory #759310 differ from traditional theories of light speed?

Faster Than Light Theory #759310 proposes that it is possible to travel faster than the speed of light, which is a fundamental limit in traditional theories of light speed. It suggests that there may be loopholes or exceptions to the speed of light limit.

Is Faster Than Light Theory #759310 supported by evidence?

Currently, there is no concrete evidence to support Faster Than Light Theory #759310. However, there are ongoing experiments and research being conducted to test its validity.

What are the potential implications of Faster Than Light Theory #759310?

If proven to be true, Faster Than Light Theory #759310 could revolutionize space travel and exploration. It could also have implications for our understanding of physics and the universe.

Are there any ethical concerns surrounding Faster Than Light Theory #759310?

As with any scientific advancement, there may be ethical concerns surrounding the use of Faster Than Light Theory #759310. It is important for researchers to consider the potential consequences and implications of this theory.

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
98
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top