- #1
Topher925
- 1,566
- 7
I need help understanding what a math problem is asking for. Its a Fourier heat transfer problem but it just isn't making any sense to me and I don't know what the author is asking for.
The heat flux through the faces at the ends of a bar is found to be proportional to un = [tex]\partial[/tex]u/[tex]\partial[/tex]n at the ends. Show that if the bar is perfectly insulated, also at the ends x = 0, x = L, (adiabatic conditions) and the initial temperature is f(x), then
ux(0,t) = 0 ux(L,t) = 0 u(x,0) = f(x)
u(x,t) = Ao + [tex]\sum[/tex]An cos(n[tex]/pi[/tex]x/L exp[ -(cn[tex]/pi[/tex]/L)2 t]
Am I suppose to assume that the initial temp (f(x)) is at x = 0 for this problem and I have to prove that there is no heat flux at both ends of the rod? Or do I assume that the temperature can be what ever at any point of the rod because it won't matter since the heat flux at the ends is 0?
I hate math texts, its like they write in a different language.
Homework Statement
The heat flux through the faces at the ends of a bar is found to be proportional to un = [tex]\partial[/tex]u/[tex]\partial[/tex]n at the ends. Show that if the bar is perfectly insulated, also at the ends x = 0, x = L, (adiabatic conditions) and the initial temperature is f(x), then
ux(0,t) = 0 ux(L,t) = 0 u(x,0) = f(x)
Homework Equations
u(x,t) = Ao + [tex]\sum[/tex]An cos(n[tex]/pi[/tex]x/L exp[ -(cn[tex]/pi[/tex]/L)2 t]
The Attempt at a Solution
Am I suppose to assume that the initial temp (f(x)) is at x = 0 for this problem and I have to prove that there is no heat flux at both ends of the rod? Or do I assume that the temperature can be what ever at any point of the rod because it won't matter since the heat flux at the ends is 0?
I hate math texts, its like they write in a different language.