- #1
lightparticle
- 1
- 0
Hi,
[c=speed of light]
if a particle travels at a velocity x/t and momentum p, such that (c-x/t) < (delta-x)*(delta-p) (ie the Heisenberg limit), how could one tell whether what one was looking at was a photon traveling at speed c or a particle traveling indeterminately CLOSE to c?
also, the speed c itself is that constant in the lorentz transformations which is the same in all intertial frames (by assumption) and at which Ganmma, 1/Sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2) ) approaches infinity.
That is to say c is a limit which the speed v of a mass approaches asymptotically but never reaches because the mass would become infinite as would the energy needed to accelerate it.
That this constant is equal to the speed of light is got from the fact that the speed, V(em), of electromagnetic radiation in the frame of the observer is given by 1/Sqrt(UoEo), where the Uo and Eo constants are the magnetic permeability and electric permitivity of a vacuum respectively, combined with the fact that physical laws are the same in all inertial frames.
BUT
since the experimental measurement of Eo is subject to the same quantum indeterminacy as any other observed measurement with laboratory equipment, there's no way to say that Eo can be measured with infinite precision.
so how can one say that V(em) is EXACTLY c since there is a necessary Heisenberg uncertainty in V(em) ?
or that all 'photons' travel at the same speed?
[notation: f(db) =DeBroglie freguency, f(em)= electromagnetic frequency]
If f(db) is the frequency of a moving particle's De Broglie wave, the total energy of the particle is given by E=(1-1/y)hf(db), (where y is gamma) which for smaller and smaller moving rest-masses each of total energy E (and therefore higher speeds) approaches E=hf(db) as v->c. That is to say the energy is given in terms of the Debroglie frequency (not the usual em frequency)
i.e. f(db)->f(em) as v->c.
Thus various particles, each traveling at speeds indistinguishably (a la Heisenberg uncertainty) close to the theoretical cosmic maximum c, have very different energies and frequencies (since the energies rise asymptotically as v->c) even though they all travel seemingly AT c (but actually immeasurably less than c)!
So how does one distinguish the difference between the two descriptions? or can they be distinguished at all? or that em waves arent just debroglie waves after all. After all Debroglie waves affect the behaviour of electrons as do em waves.
And Finally would a beam of NEUTRONS, of appropriate p and Lambda, passing an antenna ALSO affect the electrons in the antenna by means of their DeBroglie wave. would somebody out there PLEASE do the experiment. :)
[c=speed of light]
if a particle travels at a velocity x/t and momentum p, such that (c-x/t) < (delta-x)*(delta-p) (ie the Heisenberg limit), how could one tell whether what one was looking at was a photon traveling at speed c or a particle traveling indeterminately CLOSE to c?
also, the speed c itself is that constant in the lorentz transformations which is the same in all intertial frames (by assumption) and at which Ganmma, 1/Sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2) ) approaches infinity.
That is to say c is a limit which the speed v of a mass approaches asymptotically but never reaches because the mass would become infinite as would the energy needed to accelerate it.
That this constant is equal to the speed of light is got from the fact that the speed, V(em), of electromagnetic radiation in the frame of the observer is given by 1/Sqrt(UoEo), where the Uo and Eo constants are the magnetic permeability and electric permitivity of a vacuum respectively, combined with the fact that physical laws are the same in all inertial frames.
BUT
since the experimental measurement of Eo is subject to the same quantum indeterminacy as any other observed measurement with laboratory equipment, there's no way to say that Eo can be measured with infinite precision.
so how can one say that V(em) is EXACTLY c since there is a necessary Heisenberg uncertainty in V(em) ?
or that all 'photons' travel at the same speed?
[notation: f(db) =DeBroglie freguency, f(em)= electromagnetic frequency]
If f(db) is the frequency of a moving particle's De Broglie wave, the total energy of the particle is given by E=(1-1/y)hf(db), (where y is gamma) which for smaller and smaller moving rest-masses each of total energy E (and therefore higher speeds) approaches E=hf(db) as v->c. That is to say the energy is given in terms of the Debroglie frequency (not the usual em frequency)
i.e. f(db)->f(em) as v->c.
Thus various particles, each traveling at speeds indistinguishably (a la Heisenberg uncertainty) close to the theoretical cosmic maximum c, have very different energies and frequencies (since the energies rise asymptotically as v->c) even though they all travel seemingly AT c (but actually immeasurably less than c)!
So how does one distinguish the difference between the two descriptions? or can they be distinguished at all? or that em waves arent just debroglie waves after all. After all Debroglie waves affect the behaviour of electrons as do em waves.
And Finally would a beam of NEUTRONS, of appropriate p and Lambda, passing an antenna ALSO affect the electrons in the antenna by means of their DeBroglie wave. would somebody out there PLEASE do the experiment. :)