How Can I Solve This Integration by Parts Problem?

Here is an example:(2x + 3)/(x * (2x + 1)) = A/x + B/(2x + 1)A and B are constants, and you can find them by equating both sides of the equation.
  • #1
AStaunton
105
1
problem is solve the following integral by parts:

[tex]\int\ln(2x+3)dx[/tex]

I used substitution:

[tex]u=ln(2x+3)[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow du=\frac{2}{2x+3}dx[/tex]

and for dv:

[tex]dv=dx[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow v=x[/tex]

however, once I plug all these into my integration by parts formula, I get:

[tex]x\ln(2x+3)-\int\frac{2x}{2x+3}dx[/tex]

and this new integral seems hard to solve...

Any advice appreciated on what went wrong.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can approach this in either of two ways: polynomial long division or some fiddling with the numerator.

In the second approach, 2x/(2x + 3) = (2x + 3 - 3)/(2x + 3) = 1 - 3/(2x + 3), which is the same as what you would get using polynomial division.
 
  • #3
thanks..is that called partial fractions?
 
  • #4
or you could do a substitution and let u = 2x + 3 for the bottom. Then, 2x = u - 3, and du = 2dx, so you're left with the integral of ((u - 3)/(2u))du
 
  • #5
Not quite, a partial fractions decomposition on it isn't really appropriate because the bottom doesn't break down anymore. It would be more appropriate in the case

(2x + 3)/(x * (2x + 1)), for which you would find A and B such that

(2x + 3)/(x * (2x + 1)) = (A/x) + (B/(2x + 1))

2x + 3 = A*( 2x + 1) + B*x

(2)*x + (3) = (2A + B)*x + (A)

Then,
A = 3
2A + B = 2

so
6 + B = 2
B = -4

Which means we can represent the original fraction as
(2/x) - (4/(2x + 1))
 
  • #6
AStaunton said:
thanks..is that called partial fractions?
No, as Mark44 said, it's "the same as what you would get using polynomial division".

Partial fractions is a way to decompose a fraction, when its denominator can be factored.
 

FAQ: How Can I Solve This Integration by Parts Problem?

What is integration by parts?

Integration by parts is a method used to evaluate integrals that are in the form of a product of two functions. It allows us to break down the integral into smaller parts that are easier to solve.

When should I use integration by parts?

You should use integration by parts when you have an integral that is a product of two functions, and neither function can be easily integrated by other methods such as substitution or partial fractions.

What is the formula for integration by parts?

The formula for integration by parts is ∫u dv = uv - ∫v du, where u and v are the two functions being multiplied together and du and dv are their respective derivatives.

How do I choose which function to use as u and which one to use as dv?

When choosing u and dv, it is important to follow the acronym "LIATE", which stands for Logarithmic, Inverse trigonometric, Algebraic, Trigonometric, and Exponential. The function closest to "L" should be chosen as u, while the function closest to "E" should be chosen as dv.

Can integration by parts be used for definite integrals?

Yes, integration by parts can be used for definite integrals. The formula remains the same, but the limits of integration must also be applied to the integral of dv. This is known as the "boundary rule".

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
353
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top