How can Laurent series be applied to complex analysis problems?

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the Laurent series for ##sinh(z)## around the origin and proving a contour integral using residue theory. The attempt at a solution involves using Euler's relationships and substitution to solve the integrals, but it is eventually determined that the Taylor series for ##sinh(z)## is equivalent to the Laurent series and can be used to solve the problem.
  • #1
d3nat
102
0

Homework Statement


Laurent series

Homework Equations



##f(z) = sinh(z)## around origin

The Attempt at a Solution



##sinh(z +\frac{1}{z}) = \sum_{-infty}^\infty A_nz^n##
where
##A_n = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint \frac{sinh(z'+\frac{1}{z'})}{z'^{n+1}} d'##

Let c = unit circle, ##z'=e^{i \theta}##
## dz' = ie^{i\theta} d\theta##

using Euler relationships

## = \frac{1}{2\pi i} i \oint \frac{sinh(e^{i\theta}+e^{-i\theta}}{(e^{i\theta})^{n+1}} d\theta'##
Cancel out the ##e^{i\theta}## on top and bottom

## = \frac{1}{2\pi} \oint \frac{sinh(2cos\theta)}{e^{in\theta}} d\theta##

## = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} sinh(2cos\theta) e^{-in\theta} d\theta##

##e^{-in\theta} = cos(n\theta)-isin(n\theta)##

Then I said that only the ## cos(n\theta) ## part mattered because I stated the bounds of the integral were from ##0 to 2\pi##

## = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} sinh(2cos\theta) cos(n\theta) d\theta##

However, I've tried many ways of simplifying this and I can't get an answer. Any suggestions? I'm so stumped... :/

Homework Statement


prove contour integral

##\int_0^{2\pi} \frac\{sin^2{\theta)}{a+bcos(\theta)} d\theta = \frac{2\pi}{b^2} [a-(a^2-b^2)^{frac{1}{2}}]##

Homework Equations



## d\theta = \frac{-i dz}{z}##
## sin^2(\theta) = \frac{-1}{4}(z^2+\frac{1}{z^2}-2)##
## cos(\theta) = \frac{1}{2}(z+\frac{1}{z})##

The Attempt at a Solution



Subst. all in and assuming unit circle:

## = -i \oint \frac{dz}{z} \frac{\frac{-1}{4}(z^2+\frac{1}{z^2}-2)}{a+ \frac{b}{2}(z+\frac{1}{z})} dz##

rearranging

## = \frac{i}{2} \oint \frac{dz}{z} \frac{(z^2+\frac{1}{z^2}-2)}{bz^2+2az+b} dz##

Then I solved this using the quadratic equations, so I had two roots (for the denominator)

I know I have to use residue theory, but I've never had to do it with something in the numerator. Is it still the same method? I'm confused...

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
d3nat said:

Homework Statement


Laurent series

Homework Equations



##f(z) = sinh(z)## around origin

The Attempt at a Solution



##sinh(z +\frac{1}{z}) = \sum_{-infty}^\infty A_nz^n##
where
##A_n = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint \frac{sinh(z'+\frac{1}{z'})}{z'^{n+1}} d'##

Let c = unit circle, ##z'=e^{i \theta}##
## dz' = ie^{i\theta} d\theta##

using Euler relationships

## = \frac{1}{2\pi i} i \oint \frac{sinh(e^{i\theta}+e^{-i\theta}}{(e^{i\theta})^{n+1}} d\theta'##
Cancel out the ##e^{i\theta}## on top and bottom

## = \frac{1}{2\pi} \oint \frac{sinh(2cos\theta)}{e^{in\theta}} d\theta##

## = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} sinh(2cos\theta) e^{-in\theta} d\theta##

##e^{-in\theta} = cos(n\theta)-isin(n\theta)##

Then I said that only the ## cos(n\theta) ## part mattered because I stated the bounds of the integral were from ##0 to 2\pi##

## = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} sinh(2cos\theta) cos(n\theta) d\theta##

However, I've tried many ways of simplifying this and I can't get an answer. Any suggestions? I'm so stumped... :/

Homework Statement


prove contour integral

##\int_0^{2\pi} \frac\{sin^2{\theta)}{a+bcos(\theta)} d\theta = \frac{2\pi}{b^2} [a-(a^2-b^2)^{frac{1}{2}}]##

Homework Equations



## d\theta = \frac{-i dz}{z}##
## sin^2(\theta) = \frac{-1}{4}(z^2+\frac{1}{z^2}-2)##
## cos(\theta) = \frac{1}{2}(z+\frac{1}{z})##

The Attempt at a Solution



Subst. all in and assuming unit circle:

## = -i \oint \frac{dz}{z} \frac{\frac{-1}{4}(z^2+\frac{1}{z^2}-2)}{a+ \frac{b}{2}(z+\frac{1}{z})} dz##

rearranging

## = \frac{i}{2} \oint \frac{dz}{z} \frac{(z^2+\frac{1}{z^2}-2)}{bz^2+2az+b} dz##

Then I solved this using the quadratic equations, so I had two roots (for the denominator)

I know I have to use residue theory, but I've never had to do it with something in the numerator. Is it still the same method? I'm confused...

I don't get where you are going here. sinh(z) has a Taylor series around z=0. It's (e^z-e^(-z))/2. There are no negative powers of z at all.
 
  • #3
Dick said:
I don't get where you are going here. sinh(z) has a Taylor series around z=0. It's (e^z-e^(-z))/2. There are no negative powers of z at all.


I mean, yah, I can solve it with a Taylor series, but I wasn't sure how to solve using a Laurent series, which is what the problem asks.
 
  • #4
d3nat said:
I mean, yah, I can solve it with a Taylor series, but I wasn't sure how to solve using a Laurent series, which is what the problem asks.

A Laurent series is just a Taylor series possibly includes term of negative degree. sinh(z) doesn't have any. The Taylor series is the same as the Laurent series.
 
  • #5
Dick said:
A Laurent series is just a Taylor series possibly includes term of negative degree. sinh(z) doesn't have any. The Taylor series is the same as the Laurent series.

Ohhh. Well then, I feel dumb.
My professor made them out to be completely different, so I thought it was two different methods of solving.
Thanks!
 

FAQ: How can Laurent series be applied to complex analysis problems?

What is Complex Analysis?

Complex analysis is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of functions of complex variables. It is considered an extension of calculus, and it involves the use of complex numbers to analyze and understand mathematical problems.

What are complex numbers?

Complex numbers are numbers that have both a real and an imaginary part. They are typically written in the form a + bi, where a and b are real numbers and i is the imaginary unit.

What are some applications of Complex Analysis?

Complex analysis has many real-world applications, including in physics, engineering, and economics. It is used to solve problems involving electrical circuits, fluid flow, and quantum mechanics, among others.

What is the difference between real analysis and complex analysis?

The main difference between real analysis and complex analysis is that real analysis deals with real numbers and their functions, while complex analysis deals with complex numbers and their functions. Additionally, complex analysis allows for more powerful techniques and solutions due to the added dimension of the imaginary part.

What are some important theorems in Complex Analysis?

Some important theorems in Complex Analysis include the Cauchy-Riemann equations, Cauchy's integral theorem, and the residue theorem. These theorems are used to solve problems related to complex functions and are fundamental to the field of Complex Analysis.

Back
Top