How Can Subgroups Be Defined in Universal Algebra?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of subgroup in universal algebra and the challenges of defining it. It is mentioned that a subalgebra can be defined in the same way as in familiar examples, such as groups, by having a closed subset under all algebra operations.
  • #1
mnb96
715
5
Hi,
how can one define the concept of subgroup in universal algebra? is it possible at all?

The problem is that in universal algebra the concept of group is defined by assigning to the inverse element and to the identity element, respectively an unary-operator and a nullary-operator.

I am not able to use the same trick to describe a subgroup.
Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You define a subalgebras in exactly the same way you would do it for the familiar examples (e.g. groups): a subalgebra of A is nothing more than a subset S that is closed under all of the algebra operations.
 

FAQ: How Can Subgroups Be Defined in Universal Algebra?

What is a subgroup in universal algebra?

A subgroup in universal algebra is a subset of a larger algebraic structure that is itself a valid algebraic structure with operations that are closed under the operations of the larger structure. It is a smaller group that shares the same properties and structure as the larger group.

How are subgroups defined in universal algebra?

A subgroup is defined as a subset of a larger algebraic structure that satisfies three conditions: closure, associativity, and the existence of an identity element. Closure means that the operation performed on any two elements in the subgroup must also be in the subgroup. Associativity means that the order of operations does not matter. The existence of an identity element means that there is an element in the subgroup that when operated on with any other element in the subgroup, results in the original element.

What is the significance of subgroups in universal algebra?

Subgroups play an important role in understanding and studying the properties of algebraic structures. They allow for the breaking down of larger, complex structures into smaller, more manageable ones. They also help in identifying similarities and differences between different algebraic structures, and can provide insight into the overall structure of the larger group.

How are subgroups related to other algebraic concepts?

Subgroups are closely related to other algebraic concepts such as normal subgroups, cosets, and quotient groups. Normal subgroups are subgroups that are invariant under conjugation, meaning they remain unchanged when operated on by any element in the larger group. Cosets are subsets of a group obtained by multiplying a fixed element by all the elements in a subgroup. Quotient groups are algebraic structures formed by taking the elements of a group and dividing them into cosets.

Can subgroups exist in non-commutative algebraic structures?

Yes, subgroups can exist in both commutative and non-commutative algebraic structures. The only requirement for a subgroup is that it satisfies the three conditions of closure, associativity, and the existence of an identity element. As long as these conditions are met, a subgroup can exist in any type of algebraic structure.

Similar threads

I Proof for subgroup -- How prove it is a subgroup of Z^m?
Replies
11
Views
2K
B What unique contributions to math did linear algebra make?
Replies
19
Views
1K
How Is the Abelianization of a Lie Group Defined?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I What is the proper matrix product?
Replies
9
Views
2K
A Topology on a space of Lie algebras
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Group like operations that are not associative
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB What Are the Subgroups of Z_n When n Is Even?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Vladimir I. Arnold ODE'S book, about action group
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Can we construct a Lie algebra from the squares of SU(1,1)
Replies
6
Views
2K
A lemma in proving Sylow's theorem
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top